Tiquor

4 ms·

1.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Intelligently decoupled, no. Needlessly abstract, yes. Many rockstars can't tell the difference.
2.
by Tiquor 10y ago
The problem is they also leak a lot of just petty human stuff between government functionaries. The tool is blunter than Asange makes it out to be.
3.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Software development of novel ideas is art, not manufacturing.
4.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Mostly just AWS apps.
5.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Yes, this is like saying here is my slim if statement library for PHP.
6.
by Tiquor 10y ago
If all you are doing is opening an account then your registration docs alone are enough. There has to be more to this.
7.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Climatologist in radio said in an interview the other day that sea level could rise 3cm to 10m in the next X years. Follow up question was, of course, "What happens at 10m sea rise." There is definitely some tendency all around to
8.
by Tiquor 10y ago
It's not a social network design issue. It's a social issue of actual humans. Our society, currently, rewards outrage amd sensitivity as opposed to reason and the free exchange of ideas. We are essentially in a post enlightenment
9.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Boo hoo. It's not that bad. Knuckle down and learn some shit. Crikey, some of us learned this stuff before a crowd sourced 90,000 word wiki and versioned online code repository was commonplace for a 200 line library. AND get off my law
10.
by Tiquor 10y ago
"Got us wrong" implies a fundamental inaccuracy in the concept. There is not a fundamental inaccuracy in the concept. Clarification is need to explain the nuance. In regards to interpretations of their own work. They have largely
11.
by Tiquor 10y ago
You seem to be arguing semantics more than nuance. You aren't trying to say that practice doesn't matter. Right? Instead, it is debatable how much it differentiates the absolute best from those just below? If so, I think the &quot
12.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Except Gladwell didn't "get us wrong". People who read Gladwell and misinterpreted it "got us wrong". Gladwell has spoken repeatedly and clarified his book statements, Though if you read it closely there isn't
13.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Is she really pledging to create a committee to discuss the wording of a possible amendment to discuss the potential inclusion of an alteration of an amendment to be submitted to the committee for the discussion of an amendment? That sounds
14.
by Tiquor 10y ago
PHP let's you change a constant in a subclass. Doesn't seem right.
15.
by Tiquor 10y ago
I'm curious how this team got the call for the project.
16.
by Tiquor 10y ago
They just applied the approach that browsers have to the OS. Now everyone is freaking out, which is largely legitimate, but it is hard to argue that there is not a non trivial positive result for everyone to standardize on a Windows platfor
17.
by Tiquor 10y ago
What an odd comparison.
18.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Yes, I've been developing websites since before JS existed, so it does in fact make me happy that JS has made some progress related to developer productivity in 20 years. Are they adding other baggage? It seems so, but the addition of
19.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Remove bad and good from the discussion. JavaScript exists at a place where high level languages are expected, not assembly. JavaScript lacks the productivity enhancements of other high level languages. No standard library and poor debuggin
20.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Evolving toolchain? JavaScript is 20 years old and has made nearly no improvement in terms of peductivity, highlighted by the complete lack of a standard library and the still horrid browser debugging. We should be very suspect of a languag
21.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Most people wouldn't know an algorithm and concepts of algorithmic complexity if it bit them on the ass. Even devs. You don't need a PHD in computer science, just read some stuff and think a bit.
22.
by Tiquor 10y ago
You are right. Most cannot. In my experienice, the very good developers can. However, I never judge a person solely on the whiteboard test and I only get to it with the candidates that have shown other indications they are good for our team
23.
by Tiquor 10y ago
I have never found a programming language to be complex.
24.
by Tiquor 10y ago
The post author has a reading comprehension problem.
25.
by Tiquor 10y ago
A valid security layer, but obscurity is not security.
26.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Yeah, why go through all this?
27.
by Tiquor 10y ago
It is so simple and so human it isn't even really responsive. Magic!
28.
by Tiquor 10y ago
This framework is getting posted everywhere and it's not even really responsive. I saw this junk on Reddit too. People were defending it saying it had mobile and desktop sizes. What?
29.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Vigilink sits between them, the shop doesn't have to be explicitly in on it.
30.
by Tiquor 10y ago
Old (some would say current) usenet was decentralized.

More ›