Throwaway197401

6 ms·

1.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
That's not what we are talking about. We are talking about being able to cancel the activity "onChain" which you can't.
2.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Looks like this part is political: “for the physical modelling of Earth’s climate, quantifying variability and reliably predicting global warming”" And this part is actual science: “for the discovery of the interplay of disorder an
3.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
It's not like the US system. It's a negative credit score meaning that you start as a good lender and then you can only fuck it up by not paying your bills. In the US we have positive credit score meaning you have to show you are
4.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Read the report. It doesn't matter what they say at a press conference which is created to push a certain political agenda. The only thing that matters is what can be scientifically demonstrated, not just speculated. From that make you
5.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
No it's not and you have not a single scientifically demonstrated foundation for that kind of claims. Using fossil fuels is saving more lives, in fact it's making it possible for billions of people to live today. That wouldn'
6.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Here is a list 99% of all the products you take for granted are using fossile fuels. Medicin, contact lenses, paint, textiles, electronics, windmills, solar cells, concrete, asphalt, heavy machinery, most industrial manufactoring, all types
7.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Making energy more expensive is going to kill people today.
8.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Anyone who claims to be "following the science" knows that there is no such thing as "code red" in science and lo and behold it's not what the IPCC report says but a UN representative. This is a media and ideologica
9.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
I am not sure why you think it does but let me then be more precise. 1. All choices have consequences. The choice to not use combustion engines would have meant that most of us would not be alive, we wouldn't have the internet or 99% o
10.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
I don't care about models either exactly because there IS variance and because the climate is a dynamic system. We also know that to be true historically. Climate itself varies over time. So to the extent that permafrost is time specif
11.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
The climate models aren't really improving and to the extent they have the IPCC is getting less and less concerned. There is still quite a big spread between the predictions from no problem at all to world is ending. You don't hav
12.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
I am unconvinced by your argument. The models are trying to predict based on various factors, CO2 being one of them. If you were correct all you are really saying is that the models could be much simpler than still be precise. So on that al
13.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
In other words. Speculative forecasting replaces other speculative forecasting. I would urge anyone who gets worried every time they see these kind of headlines based on modelling, to spend some time reading about how modelling and predicti
14.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
You might not find it helpful right now, your current mode of thinking taken into account. I would however urge you to dig a little deeper into your beliefs and you might find that you've been thinking about this the wrong way. Why do
15.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Neither does thinking the world is going to go under. In fact having a positive outlook of the future makes you an active participant in wealth creation which is exactly what we need to create new knowledge.
16.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
Unless you are going to become a physicist or an engineer or related you aren't going to be solving anything with regards to "the climate". No amount of veganism, recycling or spartan living is going to change that. On the ot
17.
by Throwaway197401 5y ago
99.9999% of all living species have been wiped out by mother nature herself. You should find solitude in the fact that we might be the only species who actually have a chance of not becoming part of that statistic which we do by making the