ThrowMeAway1618

7 ms·

1.
by ThrowMeAway1618 9mo ago
[flagged]
2.
by ThrowMeAway1618 9mo ago
[flagged]
3.
by ThrowMeAway1618 9mo ago
>Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I don't know how you'd sell them otherwise. How do you do you process a payment without a network connection? The only thing I can think of is offering a catalog in the OS which us
4.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>Would love to see the percentage of Forbes 30u30 who also had (sorry, claimed) a disability in college. Once they get out of prison, we should ask them.[0] [0] I'll be here all week. Try the prime rib!
5.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
Perhaps you should stick to galactic history, Janov. Psychology doesn't seem your strong suit (unsurprising, given your origins and background).
6.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
> have firsthand experience being diagnosed and prescribed medication for ADHD within about half an hour of self-reporting mild symptoms with a physician remotely, And that makes you competent to determine the value of the disability cla
7.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>If someone is advertising something at you, it's because you can get it and you are potential market. >Not rocket science. Yep. I see adverts for Psoriasis and so, of course, I developed Psoriasis although I never had it before
8.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>So you advocate for executing all homeless? Thats more then 800,000 people.. What about homeless adjacent to? If you dont earn more then the median income what we get to enter you into some sort of hunger games elimination match? Absolu
9.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>> hold 20 people hostage on the bus until some enforcers navigate a busy city >Where this happens they arrive promptly. And it doesn’t happen often. Where, other than inside your mind, does this happen? Please, do be specific.
10.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>That may be something that only a small minority of fentanyl addicts are going to do, but it's not something that we have any obligation to allow in the name of helping drug addicts. Yep. There is no solution except to shoot those
11.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
>I’m not going to engage with you if you’re going to get in multiple threads and refer to things as “fashy.” >It’s difficult enough to engage in a heterodox view in good faith. I don’t need to deal with slapdash bullshit. I see we&#x2
12.
by ThrowMeAway1618 10mo ago
Or Floridians will move to New York... A new Florida Atlantic University poll reveals that nearly half of Florida residents have considered moving due to rising costs of living, despite the state’s continued reputation as an af
13.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>To put it another way, he is leading a city where a majority or close to a majority did not support his candidacy. A mandate is when a large majority of the people you are leading supported your rise to leadership and you are no leading
14.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>> You're talking out of your ass >You can't comment like this on Hacker News, no matter what you're replying to. Fair enough. >> You are ignorant of both >You can't comment like this on Hacker News, no
15.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>The Bay Area is far wealthier and much more economically relevant than NYC. Not so much. The NY Metro Area has the highest GDP of any metro area in the US[0]. The San Francisco Bay Metro area ranks fourth, behind NYC, Los Angeles and
16.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>When you have to argue semantics by defining a new term ("it's not rent control, it's rent stabilization") that's a pretty good sign that you've fucked up and you're trying to hide it. It's not &q
17.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>and also think that closing Rikers is an incredibly stupid idea! That's as may be. And you are absolutely entitled to your opinion. But you called Mamdani out for promising to enforce the law . Are you not a fan of the rule of la
18.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>He said he wanted to close down Rikers Island. Yes. He did. Because the law[0] (the passage of which he was not involved) says Riker's Island needs to be closed by 2027 -- something Eric "how much will you pay to play?&quot
19.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>after a successful Giuliani admin (yes he’s tarnished that). Successful? Try again. Rudy Guiliani was the most hated man in NYC on September 10, 2001. I'm not really sure why that changed, he was a horror. Anti-democratic (small
20.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
[flagged]
21.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>Grant special visas to doctors who commit to working at clinics for X years. Pay them some guaranteed wage that’s higher than they make in their homeland and they’ll take the deal. Do those folks get bodyguards to keep the ICE thugs fro
22.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>What kind of solution are you thinking of? The Final Solution [0](tm) of course. And the irony would be incredibly risible if it weren't so tragic. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution Edit: Added
23.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>So the model is verifying faces against ... A database of zero faces? Surely there's 200M faces in there, or else how does it work? No. The model is, "Hey! this guy is being a pain in the ass. He even claimed that The Presi
24.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
And where, exactly, did you get your MD and Phd in epidemiology, Chester? Please provide actual data supporting your ridiculous claim. You won't because you're talking out of your ass and it smells that way too. Don't you ha
25.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
No
26.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>Do we, a democratic society, have a right to pick your breakfast? Well, you can pick your friends. And you can pick your nose. But you can't pick your friend's nose. In a democratic society, that is.
27.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>I find it mildly amusing that there are so many people claiming that it's 100% on one side or other, when it's trivially easy to see why that can't be GUARANTEED TO BE the case. Yup. And it can't be guaranteed tha
28.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
“Never believe that anti-Semites [or in this case, fascist apologists] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is the
29.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
Okay, so you're a January 6th rioter/insurrectionist. I get it, you don't want to come clean as you might have some "'splainin' to do" Lucy. Enrique, is that you?
30.
by ThrowMeAway1618 11mo ago
>However, telling citizens to get fucked while taking their money and giving it to non citizens, to me, was certain to lead to violent conflict between citizens. Whose money? Being given to which non-citizens? Seriously. Be specific he

More ›