Teandw

5 ms·

1.
by Teandw 2y ago
So they've launched this site without providing a singular example?
2.
by Teandw 2y ago
A blog post that says a lot of words without really saying anything at all. The whole post boils down to "The founders of Reform have multiple companies."
3.
by Teandw 3y ago
The profit is in the ink rather than the printer. There are two issues with someone coming into the market with a cheap printer/ink. 1) It's hard for any business to keep selling a product at 10% profit margin when you know you ca
4.
by Teandw 3y ago
Legal requirement in the UK. No way around it.
5.
by Teandw 3y ago
You've clearly not experienced the reality of enterprise then. You're opinions are based on a limited understanding and knowledge of real life situations when it comes to this sort of stuff.
6.
by Teandw 4y ago
What. That's exactly how court works? How else do you think people and companies get away with doing a lot of bad things.
7.
by Teandw 4y ago
Never thought about that. According to Mr Google; believed to come from the Latin phrase “quid pro quo,” which translates into "something for something," or an equal exchange for goods or services.
8.
by Teandw 4y ago
"And yeah, 80 million pounds of profit last year. I'd buy that for a dollar" In business, last years profits are often irrelevant. This is a good example. It's a constant treadmill of trying to stay profitable - which is
9.
by Teandw 4y ago
I'm not sure you understand what's happening here or the basics of business and liquidation. "Normal companies can't go bankrupt in one day" - They didn't go bankrupt. They went into liquidation. Massively diff
10.
by Teandw 4y ago
They didn't acquire client assets for £1. That's not quite how it works.
11.
by Teandw 4y ago
You can't have a profitable bank that's insolvent. That doesn't make sense. The company has gone insolvent because it's no longer profitable.
12.
by Teandw 4y ago
The token £1 is just a payment requirement for ownership. The bidding process for insolvent companies is essentially who will take on the most "problems" for the best outcomes for the business. So one company may bid saying they w
13.
by Teandw 4y ago
Would I want certain things on the internet to be illegal, yes. Like they already are.
14.
by Teandw 4y ago
The percentage of people with mobility disabilities is extremely high. With medical breakthroughs increasing the age of life too, this is only likely to increase with time
15.
by Teandw 4y ago
Having a man in the middle of payments adds more benefits that it does cons.
16.
by Teandw 4y ago
It's free in most EU countries. I've never paid for a bank transfer. The third party doing the transaction gives me some protection that I wouldn't otherwise have. Can't argue against the anonymous part of it but when th
17.
by Teandw 4y ago
Digitizing cash has moved civilization forward in ways we could never have dreamed of.
18.
by Teandw 4y ago
What you said doesn't make sense. The seller requested the buyer to pull the money out of the bank into cash and then immediately deposited that cash into their bank account. What would be the reason for doing that? Doesn't make s
19.
by Teandw 4y ago
Money laundering, like drugs, starts in larger amounts and is broken down further down the chain it goes. Those $5 and $10 bills getting laundered started from a $50K transaction getting laundered.
20.
by Teandw 4y ago
Unfortunately we wouldn't move forward as a society if we didn't do things that affected people that didn't want to progress with modern ways of living.
21.
by Teandw 4y ago
No matter how hard you try, cash is dying. If it's a good thing or not is another debate but you're not supporting anything by paying in cash. You're simply prolonging the death with no benefit of doing so other than to pat y
22.
by Teandw 4y ago
You must be very slow using your phone.
23.
by Teandw 4y ago
They don't trust a smartphone app provided by their banking provider but they trust a random bloke they've never met with 10k in their back pocket. Right. Makes sense.
24.
by Teandw 4y ago
The problem with your thinking there is that you're making an assumption that removing rights is automatically a bad thing or a loss that affects us all, which is quite simply not true. Removing rights can be a good thing. Shall we bri
25.
by Teandw 4y ago
He's never actually given ANY evidence to prove what he's suggesting. He's only shown clinical cases which are basically "these people followed my advice and got better" - Which isn't exactly scientific. It&#x
26.
by Teandw 4y ago
I think it's because Alzheimer's essentially ends in people you know, turning into a person that you don't know. They basically turn into someone else. Because that has a more direct emotional affect on those around them, it
27.
by Teandw 4y ago
So why did the person you know need to pay the builder in that manner, rather than just transferring him the money?
28.
by Teandw 4y ago
No citation needed. It doesn't take much brain power to know that certain things are or aren't likely. It would be like asking me to prove that not many people have done the calculation of 15435 divided by 12.5 in their life. I ca
29.
by Teandw 4y ago
This is one of those edge cases where you have a way of doing business that hasn't moved forward and 'with the times'. Unfortunately when you don't move with the times, it ultimately catches up with you and forces your h
30.
by Teandw 4y ago
What would be the point in having large amounts of valuable Monero if you could never use it properly? As in, if you tried to buy a house, you'd still need to go through money laundering checks. You'd always be limited to small va

More ›