Systemerror7A69

5 ms·

1.
by Systemerror7A69 5d ago
It's absolutely amazing to see this harness. I've been on the lookout for something like this for a while now. I've used both Pi and Maki in the past but was unhappy with certain aspects for both. Pi is not respecting XDG and
2.
by Systemerror7A69 9d ago
And my wallet is thought to contain a billion dollars, so long as I don't open it. Seriously "thought to be" is such a baseless statement. Thought to be by whom? And on what basis?
3.
by Systemerror7A69 12d ago
To be honest, I believe I get the point the article is trying to make, and to an extent I agree, but I also think the point is not really made very well. The core of the argument as I understood it is that LLMs aren't just using existi
4.
by Systemerror7A69 16d ago
Even as someone using AI on the regular I'm starting to hate the "You didn't actually use this exact most expensive model so your point is invalid" argument. This is fair to say if someones last experience with AI was co
5.
by Systemerror7A69 20d ago
I think the assumption here that might not hold is simply that increases in efficiency and smaller size will be achieved by linearly just training smaller models better. You are absolutely right that there is a physical limit about these th
6.
by Systemerror7A69 22d ago
One of the big problems is that no one actually does read these scripts. You could say "Oh but it's their own fault, duh" but theres a very legitimate argument to be made users going the path of least resistance and that you
7.
by Systemerror7A69 28d ago
Yes, but since we are specifically talking about claude.md, Anthropic themselves claim on their website these files "serve[s] multiple purposes: providing architectural context, ..." ( https://claude.com/blog/
8.
by Systemerror7A69 28d ago
Theres a study from earlier this year which suggests the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11988 Most of the agents.md and what people use it for / write into is does, in fact, not make a difference. Now, sure,
9.
by Systemerror7A69 28d ago
Since it seems like this not only improved sizes but also performance I can't wait for some benchmarks and comparisons. If you don't have a separate GPU for inference, every single GB matters so a comparison between specific Q4 Qu
10.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
From what I understood in the ticket ( I haven't confirmed independently) it's the later. You can set an environment variable to move the .pi directory ( into your XDG Config dir) but it's both the cache and config combined.
11.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
Oh sorry - basically just a github ticket to an explanation about the .config folder. Pi doesn't respect XDG_BASE_DIR specification, and even if you use the env var it combines cache and config. The ticket is closed and this will not b
12.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
Sure but I'm really not that invested in one single harness. I tried out pi because people were recommending it so much. It turns out I personally have some things which annoy me, so I try out others now as well. If I don't find a
13.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
This has been frustrating me for a while and is part of why I explore other coding agents. As many advantages as pi has in some areas, there are definitely areas where I believe the hype to be a bit overstated. While the config folder is, u
14.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
Am I wrong or are these evaluations, while interesting, not really meaningful for anyone doing serious development work? I'm asking because I personally only use AI with specific and detailed instructions, building my projects piece-by
15.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
I'm in a similar situation is you are, having ADHD, and my observations have been similar. I've been more hestiant to use AI at all for a while at the beginning but even now I only ever use it for one thing at a time. It helps me
16.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
It's also relying on the assumption that the checking LLM only ever corrects wrong statements and never incorrectly "corrects" an already correct statement, which might not always be the case as well.
17.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
It's not thinking. Not in the way she probably meant. It can "think" that fast the same way a calculator can "think" that fast (kind of). Because it's not human and not "thinking", it's a mathema
18.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
If they already require your constant supervision the reason is money.
19.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
I just wish it wouldn't ask me to pipe an install script directly to shell to install. Yes, I can probably inspect that but I do think installing through package managers is the best practice. It looks better than pi with XDG and not b
20.
by Systemerror7A69 1mo ago
I've absolutely had the same experience. Pi has been praised a lot, people speaking so highly of it's code quality. And then I installed it and found all the problems you mention. Not only that but I read Github Issues about the X
21.
by Systemerror7A69 2mo ago
I don't think that example applies at all here. The quote you quoted itself said it - "subjects for high art". Theres a difference between treating the banalities of life as SUBJECTS for your art and making human, non-mass pr
22.
by Systemerror7A69 2mo ago
No, Open weights US models would not break as well - this isn't related to China or USA, it's about Open Weights and the fact that you can download the models.
23.
by Systemerror7A69 2mo ago
I've heard amazing things about pi and it's effectivenes but when I tried installing it I quickly found out it doesn't respect XDG_BASE_DIRECTORY at all, you need to set some environment variables and the author rejected bot
24.
by Systemerror7A69 2mo ago
GLM 5.2 is monstrous in size, no one is running that on their own hardware. But it's a very competitively priced model other providers can offer (since it's open) so it's a much cheaper alternative than claude in practice. I
25.
by Systemerror7A69 3mo ago
It's a bit of an indicator about the effort they put into it. If they don't even write their blogpost themselves the question of "how much effort and thought did they put into the rest of their code / product". Now,
26.
by Systemerror7A69 3mo ago
I think it's important to note that this study, at least to my understanding, compared cardio training - not weightlifting or resistance training. Participants did 3 weekly sessions of either low intensity, moderate treadmill excercise