Stasyan

5 ms·

1.
Guido van Rossum learns F#(youtube.com)
3 points by Stasyan 5y ago|0 comments
2.
Self-Hosted REST API Fuzz Testing Service from Microsoft(github.com)
4 points by Stasyan 6y ago|0 comments
3.
REST API Fuzz Testing Tools from Microsoft(microsoft.com)
1 points by Stasyan 6y ago|0 comments
4.
by Stasyan 15y ago
I use this plugin everyday. It's got some serious bugs that make my heart stop. The biggest one is Undo. Looks like the plugin keeps it's own list of modifications that were performed. So when sometimes I press "u" to undo the latest change
5.
by Stasyan 15y ago
And don't forget to download some free ram: http://downloadmoreram.com/
6.
Anyone knows what's up with Bitbucket?
5 points by Stasyan 15y ago|1 comments
7.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Every release C# becomes more like F# (only with different syntax)
8.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Funny thing is that this was posted 3 days ago : http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3111258 and it only got 5 points And the link was to the page of one of the guys who did research. ???
9.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Isn't that since Computing falls under umbrella of Mathematics and there is no Nobel prize for Mathematics (due to Nobel's wife having lover who was a Mathematician, so Nobel excluded the whole Math field from getting the prize) - Computing
10.
by Stasyan 15y ago
It's an awesome video. Thank you for posting it. I wish I could upvote you more than once
11.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Do you really need to ?
12.
by Stasyan 15y ago
> Ocaml also has the potential to be faster. At least in the single core case. F# can only go as fast as .NET. Compiled OCaml though is very fast - I completely agree with you.
13.
by Stasyan 15y ago
I meant that the syntax of OCaml is more verbose. In F# (now that the #light directive is a default) you need less comparing to OCaml. Do not need to add ;; to terminate an expression (except for in REPL). Do not need to have "done" to clos
14.
by Stasyan 15y ago
I programmed OCaml for couple of years, and now I've been programming F# for past 3 years. OCaml is more verbose than F#. F# is on par with Python. F# besides having all features of OCaml. (You could (and maybe still can) compile OCaml usi
15.
by Stasyan 15y ago
He talks about C# 4.0, but F# is not mentioned at all. Once you switch from OCaml to F# you never go back.
16.
by Stasyan 15y ago
About Us page says this : reliability Since 2000, millions of brides have trusted Isweddingdress for the most important dress(and day) of their lives. We've helped create more dream weddings than any other brial store. So you can relax with
17.
by Stasyan 15y ago
You don't have to be in college to understand that. Internet has more than enough resources for you to learn.
18.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Felt it in Toronto
19.
by Stasyan 15y ago
Can you elaborate on your skills ?
20.
Perspectives on Clojure and F# (Video from 2010)(blogs.msdn.com)
2 points by Stasyan 15y ago|0 comments
21.
Graphic novel : Funny take on the future(romanticallyapocalyptic.com)
1 points by Stasyan 16y ago|0 comments
22.
by Stasyan 16y ago
F# is fine as well
23.
by Stasyan 16y ago
But Microsoft is not in charge of Mono, plus Microsoft is applying Community Promise to Mono ( http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx ). this is from QA section: Q: Is this Community Promise legally binding on Microsoft and will i
24.
Awesome DIY papercraft toys(cubeecraft.com)
1 points by Stasyan 16y ago|0 comments
25.
by Stasyan 16y ago
searchyc.com
26.
by Stasyan 16y ago
Regarding "3d graphics remaining serious bottleneck" : any serious 3d graphics is done on GPU. C++ does not have that much advantage over Python or Java, as long as 3d computations are done on GPU
27.
by Stasyan 16y ago
Url seems to have an error. It should be : http://dlc.sun.com/pdf/800-7895/800-7895.pdf
28.
Guy Steele on Parallelism [2006](labs.oracle.com)
17 points by Stasyan 16y ago|1 comments
29.
Introduction to String Theory [2004](slimy.com)
3 points by Stasyan 16y ago|0 comments
30.
Collection of algorithms(algorithmist.com)
4 points by Stasyan 16y ago|0 comments

More ›