StandardFuture

8 ms·

1.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> Ironically enough, no discourse is so dogmatic and blind and unable to question its own values than the American one. This speech seems rather ... hateful. Shall we fine you? Officers! This man is screaming hateful speech in the public
2.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> used to enforce current political orthodoxy. Which is a nice way of saying that this is the beginnings of a new authoritarian and totalitarian age. It should be very worrying to everyone to see speech be legally punished in the West. S
3.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> I agree that there's not enough to say definitively that Enigma definitely had a major impact The parent comment wrote: > which is demonstrably false which demonstrably proves my comment perfectly valid and correct. Try again l
4.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra Quote: > The exact influence of Ultra on the course of the war is debated So, you provided a link that proves your own comment incorrect ...
5.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> and by extension the author. I love how idiots on HN are justifying blatant ad hominem attacks in their commentary as being perfectly valid. WTF is HN becoming? Are people really getting this stupid?
6.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
You did not actually prove how exactly launching criticisms of the writing style over the content is not cheap. You can hate and critique the writing style all you want, but focusing on that in your HN comments is in fact the very no
7.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Attempting to discuss the well-documented statistical declines of testosterone in men is always and completely "Alex Jones"? You need to get out more.
8.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> class of people who think sounding like a dick makes them more authoritative It's a writing style. Like it or hate it. Nonetheless, criticisms of writing style are far too cheap and shallow for HN. Be better.
9.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> inability to concentrate, confusion, alertness, consciousness, memory, anxiety, social, and sleep problems Has anyone every genuinely done any research to check if an increase in theses resulting symptoms from decreasing T levels acros
10.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> it's a useless debate Not really. It's just too complicated of a "debate" (it's actually a non-debate) or discussion to dive into the differentiating factors that will assume different priorities for different
11.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Planned obsolescence strikes again. Time for everything to go completely to Linux. Including a non-Android mobile.
12.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> But not dumbing down - skilling up But, you cannot have Wall Street consolidated market winners if you do that! How dare you! I saw this first hand growing up. The school system had a couple of programming courses a few years before I
13.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
It's not grid based. But that seems like a rather pedantic differentiation to make. It does quite literally utilize the concept of "cells". [0] I find it interesting that the project seems to have hard-coded emergence with th
14.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
But, we as a community should get better at calling these companies out publicly . Especially if they show up in a comment on the monthly hiring post. Don't let your fellow engineers get burnt. More community cooperation in this regar
15.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> The economic plays a big role, but there’s a tendency nowadays to call the root problem for everything economic As with everything on the internet (it sadly seems), there is a necessity for nuanced position . Perhaps, economic and c
16.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> so it's very hard to simulate at scale. But, this is a very unaddressed point. Why focus on "simulation" when mathematical formalisms & theories could be potentially even more useful? Especially when most "simul
17.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> https://avida.devosoft.org/ Thanks for the link! > Plenty of A-life research doesn't use cellular automata as a model. While I would like to believe you on that, one link does not seem sufficient to support the
18.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> And what would be the point of this simulation that has been running for billions of years? There is zero evidence for or against the simulation hypothesis, so why would some random person on HN be able to have the answer to this que
19.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Could someone explain the obsessive devotion to doing all Artificial "Life" research in terms of Cellular Automata? If you could supply the mathematical reasoning for this, I would be very interested in hearing the answer. And p
20.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
I believe it was a video that the World Economic Forum put out on their YouTube in 2020. I am not sure if they took it down or not since then. Related: https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11&#
21.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Marx, is that you? Did you even read my comment? And if you did read my comment then did you actually understand it? And if you actually understood it then can you actually address the points made in it instead of asking an entirely already
22.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
It sounds like "amortized" is close to mathematically meaningless in that case. Why not use actual statistics jargon at that point? Sometimes we need to realize that the reactions of people inside of the software community are alm
23.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Classic HN, two downvotes and no one is capable of providing a counter-argument. The unintelligent flourish far too easily here. They should have more demanded of them. There are no clear incentives to not just throw a punch and run away l
24.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
HN rules: apply the most gracious interpretation to my comment. > you'd see the vast mmajority of tax revenue is spent on welfare That is the point from the prior comment I am supporting. I am emphasizing that this is true because
25.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
No, as has been pointed out to you - multiple times - reaching a deal is not equivalent to a deal being legal. > The BBC is not lying No, just the status quo BBC propaganda. Let's review some quotes. > the arrival of the Biden ad
26.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> you have to have $10M in profit Sorry, I missed where this was mentioned in the article. Can you supply a link to the reference if it is not in the article? I did see the following quote: > The rules on making multinationals pay tax
27.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Exactly Zero of anything you have just said negates the point that was made. Let's reiterate: > Here's what it says in the Constitution: > "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and E
28.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
> The money actually going for care is pretty minimal. That is literally the point. Welfare = Welfare bureaucracy + Welfare Benefits This is true of everything the government does. Government = bureaucracy + benefits, with a larger per
29.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
You don't actually think that your comment negates my point, do you? The point of the sarcasm is to emphasize that if you already cannot do it with trillions then you certainly are not going to get it done with billions . It's
30.
by StandardFuture 5y ago
Crumbling infrastructure and propaganda daycare seem pretty low cost to me. It certainly reflects a low IQ society for sure.

More ›