Sopel

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   yes, you would have to allocate space for up to 100 file paths, but the article says > it’s more efficient because it reduces the amount of calls into the file system, which is where the bottleneck is Upon reading it a few times I think
2. 2.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   The cart is moving down faster than the light "bouncing" from the top of the cart towards your eyes. Whether the light can actually bounce this way I do not know. https://imgur.com/a/Aztdj4C
3. 3.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   I don't see how this is supposedly more efficient than the easier approach of listing all files and choosing a single random number in 1..n
4. 4.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   yes
5. 5.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   also in chess a better line is not required to be shorter
6. 6.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   AlphaZero does not exist, as far as modern computer chess is concerned
7. 7.▲
   by Sopel 7d ago

   They could but it's pretty much meaningless. You're bound to find outliers in favor of either engine, and the landscape is pretty chaotic
8. 8.▲
   by Sopel 4mo ago

   don't care, it has all the right points
9. 9.▲
   by Sopel 6mo ago

   chess is just a simple mathematical construct so that's not surprising
10. 10.▲
    by Sopel 6mo ago

    The ML techniques it uses are only about evaluation, but you were close
11. 11.▲
    by Sopel 6mo ago

    yes