SomeRndName11

7 ms·

1.
by SomeRndName11 2y ago
boy sounds somewhat like Turkic bala/bola ("a boy").
2.
by SomeRndName11 2y ago
Well it may have effect on ergonomics. Some people claim they cannot use 60Hz monitor after trying 144hz.
3.
by SomeRndName11 2y ago
Yeah, he said it is a flatulence circle.
4.
by SomeRndName11 2y ago
Every time I hear Rust, I recall True Detective (Rustin Cohle).
5.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
You do not need to school me about why "for" is not pure functional - as soon as you understand that it is syntactic sugar, you are fine; IO is also impure, so if you insisting in purity then the only option is Haskell. If you wan
6.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
No SML is more verbose, is pretty obvious. A simple "for" in ocaml could save lots boilerplate doing trivial recurison.
7.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
I have personally obtained unmesurable amount of relevant info from twitter; lots of true experts in every area in real time. Blogs were more like reading a published magazine article - for something not time sensitive.
8.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
1. It was USSR, not Russia. For many who were USSR citizen till 1991, but neither ethnically or geographically Russians, this rubs very wrong way. 2. Aviation in the USSR was developing completely independent, and you can accuse USSR in ste
9.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
You SML code is incorrect, shows that you actually never coded anything in SML. SML requires that "if" always contains "else" clause (which is the norm for many functional languages). And this kind of stuff which makes S
10.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
The problem that is extremely verbose though. OCaml is much more concise.
11.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
No, SML is actually quite verbose ang generally ugly, compared to say OCaml or F#, or even Scheme or Closure. This is why it is dead.
12.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
What kind of UB the author is talikng about?
13.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Still using my Sansa. Love the Cobblestoned Walts.
14.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Focus on Eyesafe monitors, esp. with Innolux panels. (such as all 28 inch 4k monitros).
15.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Much less to me. Due to more wide spectrum esp in blue area.
16.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
95% of monitors on the market are PWM free these days,
17.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
The thing with eyestrain, that it is extremely different to pinpoint what it causes for people with sensitive eye, so any alternative solution would work. The most important factor is, obviously is the backlight, and not only being PWM or D
18.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
This crude advice, which is not always effiecient. I have sensitive eyes, and many monitors cause issues even when they are set _at_ _zero_ brightness. The both feel too dim and too bright simultaneously. Even a single white letter on a bla
19.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
It is a typical advice which is efficient but flawed. All software methods to change color temperature suffer from two problems: they kill contrast (already low for IPS), and they kill color calibration. It also cannot change the backlight
20.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Not below their factory defined minimum. Which is all over of place, except for Dell and HP, which around 40 nits minimal brightness.
21.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Color temperature of the backlight LEDs have nothing to do with width of the gamut of the monitor. What matters is how narrow are spectral peaks of the primaries. You can easily have 4500K monitor with 110% coverage of Adobe RGB, for exampl
22.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
This is true only because today the borders between RISC and CISC do ot exist anymore, modern technologies would decode everything into uops anyway. But in 1980s and early 90s, this was not true. CISC was indeed more difficult to scale.
23.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
The last frugivorous ape I know was Steve Jobs. Yeah bad joke I know.
24.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
It turns out you can make a bullet out of a turd....
25.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Yes. They took them out of the bunker. They were sitting there together with Mr. Putin.
26.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Although I consider that it is moderately (5%?) probable it was a result of scientific research went wrong, they are wrong because there is dude in Ohio that researches cryptic lineages in the wastewater and his conclusion was that this kin
27.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Yes, Omicron cannot be explained evolutionary. It might be wither a lab leak (not very likely), or result of being inside of someone who takes mutagens.
28.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
They have probably meant guided natural selection.
29.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
Lab leak has never been "debunked". It is still a very much a possible route of the introduction of Wu-1 into the general population.
30.
by SomeRndName11 3y ago
I live in ex-USSR Central Asia and there is no such a thing as return, but many stores allow you to take an item and echange for different size if does not fit.

More ›