Sol-

7 ms·

1.
by Sol- 5d ago
The AI driven mode collapse of human thought advances. I am no skeptic or anti-AI, but this is definitely a concern I share. You even notice it in normal mundane tasks like programming, never mind the AI generated prose that we at least hav
2.
by Sol- 6d ago
I will admit I asked Fable about Mitochondria.
3.
by Sol- 7d ago
I think the personal drama aside, the moral of the story is: If you are working on an interesting breakthrough in any domain amenable to AI-supported solutions, make sure to keep it secret, lest a more well-resourced party (in particular th
4.
by Sol- 8d ago
> OpenAI looked at user data, stole world class researchers' work This doesn't seem to be clear and is very implausible for a large company. Be as cynical as you want, but a normal researcher will simply not have access rights
5.
by Sol- 23d ago
> A good idea, a terrible implementation Story of European regulations. At some point you have to concede that they are incompetent and unaccountable. What do they care if they depress economic integration and growth in Europe? No one wi
6.
by Sol- 1mo ago
Definitely something I've come around to as well, even though I am very pro-AI and think it's an amazing technology. But the bottlenecks just hit too hard. I notice every day where my usage of AI is so constrained, by myself and m
7.
by Sol- 2mo ago
EU once again at the frontier of AI.. regulation. Hard to assess what this rule will actually accomplish. Ultimately AI will be involved in all creative processes going forward, so all pieces of media will have at least some basic AI discla
8.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Unlike the US, wealth takes on the EU could perhaps raise revenue without disrupting innovation, because here in the EU, we have little innovation and self made wealth to begin with - so there's nothing to disrupt. But taxing inheritan
9.
by Sol- 2mo ago
How does it perform on HuggingFaceExploit bench? Suspiciously absent, so not sure if I can take the model seriously. On a serious note, I hope they improved their extremely sabotaging and unspecific bio safeguards, which prevented Fable fro
10.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Ironic that HuggingFace needed Chinese models to defend against it. But of course the spin of the leading firms will just be to point at their trusted access programs and demand that all dangerous activities, even if just defensive, happen
11.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Perhaps fortuitous timing for OpenAI that they can spin the fact that defenders have to resort to open Chinese models because OpenAI and Anthropic actively sabotage them with nerfed models into a nice message of making Huggingface part of t
12.
by Sol- 2mo ago
For me, harnesses are mostly sticky insofar as the model providers only allow you to use their subsidized plans through their own harnesses, unfortunately. But of course switching model + harness is an option.
13.
by Sol- 2mo ago
While I'm sympathetic to the frictions of newly introduced AI and the fact that AI in healthcare, especially calls, can seem very uncaring, between the lines the article reads a bit like the typical union complaining about modern tech
14.
by Sol- 2mo ago
I wouldn't be surprised if models were optimizing for pelican-related comment chains at this point
15.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Isn't it realistically only worth talking about SpaceX stock a few years out? The random walk the stock will do after an IPO seems very uninformative.
16.
by Sol- 2mo ago
How do you couple them together efficiently? The nice thing about Codex or Claude is that the delegation or multi agent workflow capabilities are just built-in. Do you link one with the other as a skill or mcp or so?
17.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Interesting how the prevalent opinion until yesterday seems to have been that OpenAI & Anthropic are irreversibly ahead and now with xAI and Meta at least delivered something that's competitive with useful models and cheap too. Gra
18.
by Sol- 2mo ago
I just think that Anthropic's usage of the word "classifier", which implies a minimum level of intelligence, was very misleading. Fact is, you cannot use Fable for anything remotely connected to even elementary school biology
19.
by Sol- 2mo ago
Aren't they already very cognizant of handwringing like yours? Their article mentions various safeguards and actively steering the model away from being emotional companions and so on. It's a far cry from the OpenAI two years ago
20.
by Sol- 3mo ago
I think the SpaceX IPO showed them to rent the clusters for billions a month
21.
by Sol- 3mo ago
Seems to be a very bad mechanism to ensure democratic control of the technology. There must be better ways, even naively assuming that OpenAI is somehow genuine about wanting to broadly share its stake in the future.
22.
by Sol- 3mo ago
xAI has shown this to be quite lucrative. And it seems to even make some sense - if the contract can be ended on relatively short notice, you basically have the capacity on stand-by if you ever need it yourself (accumulating GPUs is not tri
23.
by Sol- 3mo ago
That was my impression in the past as well, but by all accounts pangram works well, at least at the moment. It also seems quite plausible that it can be made to work by training on a lot of model output. Most of us already have become very
24.
by Sol- 3mo ago
Yeah, I also got suspicious and checked it with Pangram. Sadly 100% AI. Perhaps it still has good points, but my heart drops whenever I sniff the AI prose. I can just query Claude or ChatGPT myself, you know?
25.
by Sol- 3mo ago
The EU simply doesn't have a proper common market, especially when it comes to capital. Having more people than the US and a big economy in aggregate doesn't matter much if you can't efficiently pool resources. Could we in Eu
26.
by Sol- 3mo ago
Which is a mistake the EU makes again and again. If you put onerous requirements on everyone, this means that the most well-capitalized firms will be able to shoulder the regulatory overhead the easiest. But who can't? New European sta
27.
by Sol- 3mo ago
Wonder if the whole cyber paranoia leads to their models ultimately generating less secure code. After all, if it has the ability to generate safe code, it would imply that it knows something about cybersecurity, which could surely be used
28.
by Sol- 3mo ago
So it's like Claude Cowork for Science, i.e. for less tech-savvy users? I would imagine scientists with some coding background might just prefer to use Claude Code normally and integrate it with their stack of choice, but perhaps the c
29.
by Sol- 3mo ago
The money can't all come from the state. If the EU wants to compete, it should create a common market worth its name where EU companies can raise billions like American ones. If that doesn't happen but we instead pat ourselves on
30.
by Sol- 3mo ago
I know that Europe thinks so (I'm from there too), but we aren't remotely competitive enough for decoupling. It's bowing to US demands or falling further behind economically. Self-made problems, of course, since the common ma

More ›