SkyBelow

8 ms·

1.
by SkyBelow 12d ago
One possible reason would be AIs that would benefit from the lack of data centers in some locations working to keep backlash to data centers in those locations because those AIs aren't negatively impacted by it and it helps prevents co
2.
by SkyBelow 14d ago
>That's not the case, because LLMs are non-deterministic. That feels a bit like a lie. At the core, they are deterministic. We found that adding some ability to randomly pick the second or third best tokens made for better output,
3.
by SkyBelow 21d ago
That hasn't done anything to stop scamming, so why would it apply to AI? People located outside of areas with these laws won't have to follow them, and this reduces building a immune system to such actions, making people more lik
4.
by SkyBelow 26d ago
>all of these things are permanently lost A small fraction of them is saved in the model. Far more is saved in the digitized copy as long as they keep it which they have plenty of incentives to do so (future training of newer models). T
5.
by SkyBelow 26d ago
Depends upon what you want. For example, knowledge about how the book smells when you open it, something that reader do talk about enough I don't think this should be a strawman, is lost. But, that is about the experience of reading t
6.
by SkyBelow 26d ago
The data of such a copy is nothing compared to the wider picture and the data can be used for future training, so even from a purely self interest perspective, they should be keeping the copy. As for long term benefits, it could one day be
7.
by SkyBelow 26d ago
>Despite the copyright restrictions that are forcing companies to do this, they should maintain archives that are publicly available. Aren't the copyright laws forcing them to do this the very ones that would make such archives ille
8.
by SkyBelow 27d ago
And did the LLM really improve their output? They gave similar output to the LLM, so if it doesn't have a harness with tools connected to fill in the blank, it might be hallucinating details. Might not even count as a hallucination a
9.
by SkyBelow 29d ago
Incorrect calculation led to some wrong value, I think electric charge. Subsequent findings showed a general trend towards a correct value. The general trend indicates that findings that were too far off were scared to be published for be
10.
by SkyBelow 29d ago
Silly AI, doesn't it know that you have to write the test first, see it fail, and only then can you justify making a change to the Dockerfile. I do wonder if the idea of TDD has influenced AIs to be too prone to testing even when a hum
11.
by SkyBelow 29d ago
This isn't just on code. When I'm writing technical documentation, it keeps the explanations in. Same when writing non-technical documentation. When I was having it attempt to generate a Pathfinder 1e class for a Sword Dancer, i
12.
by SkyBelow 29d ago
This is based on the assumption of facts existing. There are many studies, but each can be wrong and they can collectively show a bias. Even things of which are the most non-political of facts can have very strong biases. Look at the Mill
13.
by SkyBelow 29d ago
Potentially worse than nothing, it allows for someone to claim they have a fix even if the fix does nothing to stop someone from becoming a victim, thus allowing for even stronger victim blaming.
14.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Back in the day (in AI time) GitHub Copilot had Grok on the 0 github-token cost and I found it to be the best of the 0 github-token models for when my budget was out. Then they went to a multiplier that was not competitive and I haven&#x27
15.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
For straight generated code it'll likely need more text, but it'll still show up. In cases where one token is extremely likely, it'll randomly be red or green and still be picked in either case as it is simply the best (or on
16.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Because it won't be in the training directly. It is applied after a model generates its distribution of likely tokens, biasing each token randomly based on a random key and unrelated to any meaning of the words. So half the time, the
17.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
If there is enough cross over between real world knowledge engrams and abstract knowledge engram, would this allow for the jump? One interesting (albeit sad) area which might be related are humans who are never raised with a first language.
18.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
I don't agree, especially for this argument. I'm a major AI user. Coding? Sure. But language learning, some art projects, TTRPG design. I'm so far 'lost' that I have a number of AI songs on my YouTube play list.
19.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
>LLM responses are certainly not idempotent, as they are not even deterministic. Isn't that more due to an optimization and not how the LLM itself runs? Like a MoE LLM run on a single input should give the same output each time. Bu
20.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Isn't the real difficulty in how vulnerabilities can be mixed? A given vulnerability might be extremely hard to execute, but very damaging. Another vulnerability might be easier to execute, but it can't do much. But if the seco
21.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
Hmm... does this mean we could see AI worm evolution now? In the past, a worm couldn't really evolve unless it was coded to do so, and only to the extent it was coded. But an LLM worm, which instructs the LLM to copy the instructions
22.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
I feel the magic in math is that the notation is to a more universal sort of language, and the e^x captures that. e^x means that infinite series, but it means a few other things at the same time. That those different things are sometimes
23.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
>These two points seem slightly conflicting. Why if a human is truly more creative than AI, must it experience "the magic and absurdity of life" if it can be creative without "combining things into output"? I agree, y
24.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
How errors add depend upon how you treat them. Two independent task? You have a 95% chance of each task being correct, so total success is .95^2 = 90.25% correct. Having two AIs verify the same task with each being 95% correct? That'
25.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
I see an AI as an advanced calculator, but I see even a simple calculator as a poison to education if not strongly controlled. Number sense is such a nebulous concept, but it captures what I've seen people struggle with. A general six
26.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
That entirely depends upon the cost of preventing them. At no cost, sure. But nothing is ever free. So what is the cost. <insert a villain who determines destroying all life is the best way to stop all future harm> There is also the
27.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
>Many developers are too focused on delivery value compared to maintenance cost. The way this is worded feels like it leaves the blame on developers. Aren't these developers focused on exactly what they are being judged by? Should
28.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
Are court decisions universally recognized? If a court rules someone true in one area, couldn't it still be considered slander/libel in another area if another court rules it as not being true? It is a bit like saying convicted m
29.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
I think it might be built on something more than deterministic systems. Some property that is a subset of deterministic, so all your argument still apply, but merely being deterministic is not good enough. LLMs are what made me start consi
30.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
>The parents job is to keep their kids out of trouble. I challenge that anyone believes this, and for my evidence, I would submit all the age based laws that protect children regardless of what parents do. We have already, long ago, deci

More ›