SirMadam

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by SirMadam 12d ago

   I believe they're arguing AI manufacturers and developers are the people primarily aware of the risks, and not random users necessarily. If OpenAI staff runs an ExploitBench knowing the risks, and it hacks into HF, they KNEW the risk g
2. 2.▲
   by SirMadam 2mo ago

   Gave the repo a once over: Self hosting [of the whole application in general] is a first-class citizen of the project, and the AI features are both: a. completely optional/disable-able and b. Self hosted llm friendly, with specific ins
3. 3.▲
   by SirMadam 3mo ago

   SOTA LLM specific compression achieves around ~54%! https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06252v3
4. 4.▲
   by SirMadam 7mo ago

   While I would like to believe you, doesn't this legal document linked by the article show that, in at least one of the cases, the author WAS trying to apply with himself, "Mr. Allen", as the author? And not the AI? https:&#x
5. 5.▲
   by SirMadam 7mo ago

   If SCOTUS is saying that AI works, even those co-authored by humans, are not eligible for copyright/patenting; Doesn't that mean any code-base that uses AI generated code does not have an implicit copyright holder? And thus even t