Signatura

6 ms·

1.
by Signatura 8mo ago
That’s an interesting comparison... The licensing point highlights how much of the burden in software hiring sits on explanation rather than verification. Without shared baselines, candidates end up narrating their competence instead of po
2.
by Signatura 8mo ago
That makes sense, and I think your skepticism is reasonable. From the candidate side, it’s almost impossible to tell whether criteria are being refined thoughtfully or just drifting based on recent hires or strong opinions in the room. What
3.
by Signatura 8mo ago
I don’t think the gap you’re describing is about quality of work as much as how it gets interpreted. What you described, building something end to end, making real tradeoffs, and caring about the problem is exactly the kind of signal people
4.
by Signatura 8mo ago
Austin, that makes sense. The signaling problem cuts both ways: Resumes try to compress complex ability into keywords, and job descriptions try to describe real work with abstract labels. A lot gets lost in between. The unclear goals point
5.
by Signatura 8mo ago
I think that’s a fair list, and it highlights how much of the process sits outside the candidate’s control. Macro forces, internal incentives, and human bias all stack on top of each other, and the candidate only sees the outcome, not the c
6.
by Signatura 8mo ago
I agree with this. What stands out to me is that the hiring process often treats one internal mental model as “correct”, and anything outside of it as a flaw in the candidate. The example you gave about solving the same problem differently
7.
by Signatura 8mo ago
I’m one of the co-founders and went through this process myself. Not promoting anything here - genuinely interested in how others experience this and what helped create clarity.
8.
Ask HN: Why does job search feel so unclear even for strong candidates?
4 points by Signatura 8mo ago|14 comments