SexyCyborg

5 ms·

1.
by SexyCyborg 4y ago
You can get 265-275nm LEDs- they are effective but you have to check them since there are constant scams. https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/154177301370350387... You also have to dump a lot of heat so ther
2.
by SexyCyborg 4y ago
Yes, but they could not, for instance get data on or conversations I've had with other people and go after them. A firestop of sorts. It's far from a universal solution, just a very low tech, very theatrical option for very specif
3.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>hang her nude bits out. Well no, nothing of the kind was occurring in the demonetized videos referenced in my post. I did not have more skin on display than any typical YouTuber might under the circumstances. It was a tank top and a hal
4.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>Considering something like body dysmorphia (as an example) might help give someone benefit of doubt. I'm not going to pretend to understand exactly why someone feels that way. Yes, it is something like that. But it's bullshit
5.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Yes
6.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
> Just checked her channel and every episode is her in a tube top and short shorts. Maybe she's technical, but the way shes dressed is clearly with the intent to draw people in sexually. No. I look how I've always looked. My cl
7.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Yes I made YouTube demonetize my videos for uh...Hacker News attention. Yep, checks out.
8.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Thank you!
9.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Because if there's anything to judge a person on the basis of, it's Reddit logins they chose when they were 20 and stuck with as they grew in popularity
10.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Thank you! I'm an English major and have worked very hard at it- still love to hear it though!
11.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>You think your successes would have been harder to achieve if you didn't advertise with sex appeal? You don't need to justify yourself for anything but you still sound like you feel the need to do so. Oh, not at all. It's
12.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Oh come on...
13.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>But the engineering feats alone will never be the focus as a consequence. There's a line between "never be the focus" and "we will erase you". This sort of thing is constant- but I'll give you a recent exam
14.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Well said
15.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>I often think of your public statements against SJW issues and people diminishes your feminist work. Who's a feminist? Those disappear where I'm from. Thing is marginalized women living in circumstances that would make most of
16.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>You're doing good work. Don't stop. We in America need more people to understand why Shenzhen works. We used to have cities like that in the US Thank you >An automatic tool setter for the SYIL mill will make it more useful.
17.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>Didnt this happen before? Regularly, not sure why this time made HN.
18.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
I'm aware it's incongruous. The whole thing makes very sensible people uncomfortable because it seems vulgar and unnecessary. And that's going to be the case until I butch up and use my words. Probably won't help much, b
19.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>Not sure the analogy holds when Visa and Mastercard repeatedly warn the hotel they’re violating their ToS, but the hotel dgaf If the complaint is "your hotel is made of brick" and it's not in the ToS that's a problem
20.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
That's very kind of you. No Patreon and Western sponsors are understandably reluctant to work with a Chinese national- even those that are ok with my appearance. Chinese businesses can't figure out how I am still online, most don&
21.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
See: https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/139660466709473690... There's more, but again, until/if I can explain it more fully, it's on me.
22.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
It would be used against me to further discredit my technical work. There are plenty of people who would love to be able to accurately refer to me as an "Only Fans model".
23.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
Absolutely. And I'm free to call out the hypocrisy of that given their PR messaging about diversity and inclusion.
24.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
My videos are all marked "not for children".
25.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>That statement seems incongruent with getting breast implants/plastic surgery... Yes, it does seem that way. That's on me until I'm willing to offer a more complete explanation.
26.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>Ok, thats fine if she wants to do sexual content. You are sexually attracted to dressmakers dummies made out of 4mm cardboard?
27.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>She is a conundrum: is she titillating or expressing herself, or maximising her reach? Initially, before I was Outed I could not explain any of it. Which was...frustrating at the time to say the least. Now, as shitty as getting Outted w
28.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>how do you know their videos aren't demonetized? “No, there won't be an answer as to why men making nude female torsos will not be subject to the same enforcement and never have been.” I pressed YouTube on are or would those v
29.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>She has not been demonetised, despite the clickbait title, but classified as adult which means roughly 99% less ad revenue. Correct
30.
by SexyCyborg 5y ago
>Google isn't saying she can't put her body on YouTube, they're saying they don't think they can sell ads on that content. If advertisers would pay for controversial content, we wouldn't be having this discussion

More ›