SenoraRaton

10 ms·

1.
by SenoraRaton 3y ago
But somehow having a freeloader at the top that siphons off profits is totally fine? I would much rather have someone that I quite literally worked with, and the rest of the staff interacted with freeloading, than some franchisee owner who
2.
by SenoraRaton 3y ago
Does it? If the rest of the community doesn't want you there, seems pretty cut and dry. There are no "managers" at Valve, yet they fire people all the time. You would simply receive your pay, and whatever your portion of t
3.
by SenoraRaton 3y ago
One thing that I never understood was, if an employees wages are tied to the success of the company, would that not incentivize better work ethic as a whole? That is how it works in the start-up world. You get equity, you have literally i
4.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
I'm pretty sure child labor is against the law....
5.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
You don't actually spend 100,000s of hours memorizing openings. You study the basic opening principles and key variants, but for the most part it comes very naturally. You play 100,000s of hours of chess, and EVERY chess game has an
6.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
You forgot the civil rights movement.
7.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Lets just take Amazon for example. They donated to organizations(ACLU/NAACP etc). Likely non profits that support the POC communities. No one is paying protesters to be in the streets.
8.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Sure, here is an example of these "testimonies", and how their stories changed: After: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7599941/Whistleblow... Before: https://www.theglobeandmail.com&#
9.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Amnesty international has a troubled history. https://www.mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troublin... Luis Kutner was a co-founder of Amnesty international, and Kutner would go on to form the “Friends of the FBI” gr
10.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Hahahaha, centuries old techniques are now "cutting edge".
11.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
China pulled an entire nation of 1 billion people out of poverty, industrialized and become a global force in less than a century. As is typical with propaganda, you must demonize the enemy as an all knowing specter read to pounce, and at
12.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
I question the validity of the accusations i Xinjiang. If you can provide me evidence of wrongdoing, I will be more than glad to read and investigate it. China is dealing with radical Islamists in the best way they feel they can. I never
13.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Because propaganda and nationalism are one hell of a drug.
14.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r... I would argue that the United States is worse than China. China isn't, nor has it really ever been imperialist. The United States is an imperia
15.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Less?! I have had little to no problem finding even niche media on the internet...
16.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Is not the post you just posted on a "forum" A rose by any other name is still a rose.
17.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Except there ARE two sides. Capital controlled means of production, and worker owned means of production. These two systems are diametrically opposed to each other. This just comes across as enlightened centrism. I am vehemently opposed
18.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
Arch aur has never let me down.... Linux package managers in general. Curated content, secondary and tertiary content of varying levels of risk. Most high risk activities hidden behind a knowledge gap, yet still available. It is a super
19.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. B
20.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
... You think the Google/Facebook/The US government aren't insidious agencies?
21.
by SenoraRaton 6y ago
I would agree that most people seek companiship, but in a modern climate I think the number of people who want children is diminishing.