Scholmo

8 ms·

1.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Be aware that you do not overestimate one single data point. They also might be super busy right now etc.
2.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
As mentioned in my other comment, I just spend too much time on hn so thats why its a new account. I do not profit from AI but I think the cat is out of the bag. We have companies like google who has so much money, R&D in AI is just som
3.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
The stove is in one place, it produces heat, we train everyone that this is dangerous including our kids (firefighters showed me in 1th grade what an oil fire is). We added stinky smell to gas. Pressure cookers are only used by 1-2 people i
4.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
My hugo example is real. I'm a software engineere for 15 years, have used other templating engines but i struggled with the hugo docs for setting up the initial templating structure. Nonetheless, I always also see this in the 'wit
5.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Yeah sry but I meant easier. But why do you think it would make it easier? Power-steering doesn't mean there are sensors build in or more precise ones. Your reddit comment references autonomes vehicle and in that case it shouldn't
6.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
In a normal household? Like what? I have nothing compared to a 60kg robot who is moving around in my flat. Even in my daily life the only thing i can come up with, is a car. Nontheless, industry pays more, faster, has more generic basic use
7.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
I added talking points like the one were i state that people call support just to fix issues they could fix themselves. My point with my mum should imply that it was successful but for sure at least you are pointing something out and now we
8.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
It was a significant jump from whatever we had before to a quality unseen before. As i mentioned, i threw english and german at it. How many people can change the time on their microwave? How many people can ask an LLM through voice or tex
9.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Do you want to add any argument so we can discuss this? I mean, did you not write with ChatGPT and were surprised how well it response? I'm schocked how well i can talk to an AI through some app like Gemini or ChatGTP. A few years ago
10.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
It could also lead to a massive crash of capitalism and reevaluation of how our society functions. It could lead to significant progress in every single research area. I'm at least very impressed about the amount of open models and tha
11.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
You might just overhype this blog. I read one of his last week? and didn't like it that much. I read this one despite it because its quite high on hn for whatever reason. I don't think everything is lies and i don't like how
12.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Don't agree with this. LLM when it came out, was perfect as an interface between a system and a normal human. So many people call customer support for issues they could in theory fix themselves. If that LLM system can understand me wel
13.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Its still true and shows one of many issues with bitcoin. Based on bitcoin cryptobros, you need a certain amount of independent miners for the 'quality' of bitcoins. A bitcoin miner if its a state, can operate with a loss a lot lo
14.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Man come one not only is this the wrong analysis because Tesla only has one single model, they literaly build 50k cars which are not sold 50.000 My guess, they made them for pushing the Space X IPO. The same why he did this weird Keynote la
15.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
The industry has a lot more money and easier use cases. A robot like Optimus will not be a household robot for years to come. Why? If it falls, it will crash into some kind of glas from doors to windows etc. If it falls it might crash a hum
16.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
There are plenty of positions were you have normal humans doing only a handful of tasks. Checkout youtube on some chinese factories building like rice cooker and co. They have like 10-50 stops were one person only does like 1-5 things. Putt
17.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
I don't think thats true. Its power steering already and cars use that to turn a wheel when you are not driving. So why would that make it safer?
18.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Planes are probably the most controled machines we have. Everything gets checked twice or more, everything gets tracked and there is a clear requirement to do it like this because, as you said, its not possible for humans to control a fight
19.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
He is saying all of this for his IPO. Its still a hard problem and while he likes to move that fast, nothing around him wants to move that fast. No burocrazy at least.
20.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Bosten dynamics has the better robot which doesn't overheat and can more and they plan to rollout commercially 2028. Musks Robot overheated last year, we have not seen a single non staged real demonstration in public and he already wan
21.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Optimus was still overheating last year. And while Musk is very good in announcing stuff, delivering he is not. boring company? Robotaxis on masses? Did you watch his keynote last week? Man he is ignorant. It would be a million times cheape
22.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Its build in guard rails. Its potentially also reduced context it has to know. Its also a very good way to scale. Lets build a very small and well tested library for x, llm uses x for case y. it doesn't have to worry about x, its conte
23.
by Scholmo 5mo ago
Yes! I mean who tf gives some small team millions to put some Nvidia GPU into space and thinking we will have market disrupting GPU clusters in space in 10 years?! There are so many low hanging fruits in IT Industry to just being solved. Ev