Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Scea91
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Scea91
6d ago
The civilian cost was intentionally not part of the equation. The toxic effects were known and the numbers show that it was not a few isolated accidents but a intentional disregard for the human cost.
2.
▲
by
Scea91
6d ago
2) Unintentional side-effect affecting millions of Vietnamese people? Hundreds od thousands of children born with birth defects.
3.
▲
by
Scea91
8d ago
The wording seems to confirm it was part of training data at some stage. If not, they would be able to prove it quite easily I assume.
4.
▲
by
Scea91
4mo ago
Same can be said about human review if the argument is non-determinism.
5.
▲
by
Scea91
4mo ago
Its a problem of the individual institutions and countries. The budget required for AI tools currently is negligible compared to other university expenses. We don't need to call everything a systemic disadvantage when the disadvantaged
6.
▲
by
Scea91
7mo ago
I don't think number of parallel agents is the right productivity metric, or at least you need to account for agent efficiency. Imagine a superhuman agent who does not need to run in endless loops. It could generate 100k line code-base
7.
▲
by
Scea91
8mo ago
> Parents can’t help but worry about how a lack of AI preparedness will affect their kids’ future career prospects. The parents I've interacted with who have this worry tend to be the least tech/AI literate. It reminds me of th
8.
▲
by
Scea91
8mo ago
I am afraid that in a total war, all available resources will be used.
9.
▲
by
Scea91
8mo ago
I am pretty low confidence here but I think in theory it should but in practice there is no mechanism enforcing that? UMA's current market cap is $68M. There are some Polymarket markets far exceeding that.
10.
▲
by
Scea91
8mo ago
UMA's security model assumes the cost to corrupt the oracle exceeds the profit from corruption. It is quite interesting because it doesn't consider the Polymarket side at all in the calculation. Doesn't this whole model break
11.
▲
by
Scea91
8mo ago
> - (~2023) Ok, it can write a full function, but it can't write a full feature. The trend is definitely here, but even today, heavily depends on the feature. While extra useful, it requires intense iteration and human insight for &
12.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
> Only a well done mix makes you resiliant. I agree on this point, me not being anti-Nuclear doesn't mean I am anti-wind or solar. Every country has different circumstances, I live in a landlocked country with mild mountains, temper
13.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
In the last 90 days France's CO2 footprint is at 78% of Iceland's. Also, what lessons learned in Iceland, Norway or Albania should we apply in central Europe? We don't have their geothermal and hydro potential (all your examp
14.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
Right at this moment Germany's electricity mix has 364gCO2eq/kWh carbon intensity, France is at 21. That is because 37% of Germany's production comes from gas and coal. Even from an environmental standpoint, France is doing m
15.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
I was in such a role and am now being pushed out of it (promoted to PE). What I really love about it is the leverage. In a technical domain with a good core team it is almost like running your small company.
16.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
Its tricky to use statistics for personal decisions. In general something might be correct but not for your specific subgroup. I know many people who changed for worse. If you are in a bad position then change, but if you like the company a
17.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
> WWI in which all sides were equally guilty for all of it. Not true, while Germany was not solely responsible, it and Austria-Hungary were much more responsible than others.
18.
▲
by
Scea91
1y ago
Yes, its pretty simple. Different audiences prefer different style. Experts prefer brevity and jargon, they don't need explanations of concepts they already understand. Beginners prefer less jargon and inline explanations as they'
19.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
@paulg does not seem like a hardcore MAGA supporter based on his tweets.
20.
▲
Axelrod's Tournament
(cs.stanford.edu)
1 points
by
Scea91
2y ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
It seems more and more that if war between US and China starts it will be US-initiated. You just can’t stand not being the top dog anymore. For context, EU+UK is over 500M people, Russia is 143M. I think two weeks back many Europeans took f
22.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Sounds very similar to how the Ukraine “special military operation” was intended and you see the result. Its also probably a scenario Taiwan’s defense is preparing for.
23.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
EU+UK is over 500M people. Even if I accept your transactional mindset and put all values aside isn’t it still worth it to have them on our side? They will probably not align with China but will naturally drift closer if they no longer see
24.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Do supporters of this philosophy still self-identify as conservatives? Such radical futurist visions seem directly opposite to core conservative values.
25.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Eventually the pendulum will swing back.He would definitely sell the message much better than Kamala
26.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Is any of these equivalent in nature to, for example, censoring information about Tiananmen square events?
27.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Atheism is defined as the absence of belief which is essentially what OP said. The fact that we are open to changing our mind if theoretically presented with strong evidence does not make us agnostic. You’d probably also accept that sun is
28.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Seems like the root cause is not email. I am curious how “another app” would be better in your situation than just setting up an email rule (3 min task at most) for this mailer if you truly care about it.
29.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
Normal distribution has an exponential term in it. Your intuition is mostly correct for the >100 part of IQ but thats totally in line with it being normally distributed. Intelligence is not exponentially distributed. That would mean that
30.
▲
by
Scea91
2y ago
It can totally be argued from first principles. If you acknowledge that USA is a union and not a single state then it makes sense that the votes do not necessarily reflect the population distribution and there is some form of rebalancing. T
More ›