Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SaucyWrong
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
6d ago
I was alive for that but had forgotten about it…wild.
2.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
9d ago
My brainstorming led down a similar pathway of, "deluding powerful human actors that the systems must not be interfered with at any cost." I'm not sure I buy it though. Seems to me like if humanity were even approaching that
3.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
10d ago
> while replicating wildly Earnest question: by what mechanism that exists today would the achieve that in a way humans on top top of the situation could not curtail? All of this runs on top of compute in meatspace that humans can discon
4.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
13d ago
Hmm, I wonder if, as a plaintiff that wished to file a complaint against a police department, would the records be gone by the time I got far enough through the courts to force evidence discovery. All of the Flock-lovers I talk to love to b
5.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
28d ago
I recognize your username from other comment threads and would classify you as a bun fanatic, but even so, I’d hold off on saying, “it’s working for bun,” until 1.4.0 has been out of canary for, like, more than 24 hours. Most real users hav
6.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
You are completely unhinged.
7.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
Bummer, I liked my AirPods…
8.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
Jarred wrote a lengthy blog about the rewrite a little while ago and IIRC the token burn numbers were in there (or at least the burn up to that point in time). https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust
9.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
This remains one of the strangest and frankly most annoying beefs I’ve ever read about all decade, and I say this as somebody with no particular affinity for bun, rust, or zig.
10.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
This isn’t financial advice, but Defense contractors seem to be a solid hold in a winter economy with this insane and hawkish “war department”. This administration’s primary means of distraction from issues at home appears to be “start a co
11.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
Perhaps. But did democrats famously take a “chainsaw for ‘government waste’” to all major federal agencies? No. That was a handful of Republican edgelords.
12.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
Ok then, just get rid of qualified immunity. The city will take care of their liability issues on its own.
13.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
1mo ago
Disagree. I don’t need to be a subject matter expert on the environment or fire risks to profit from a wildfire prediction market. I need enough money to buy a pack of cigarettes. EDIT: I suppose I also need to be able to purchase the “shar
14.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
As in: build me Facebook-like social network. <proceeds to break into meta and steal the source code>
15.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Yeah I guess most interesting LLM work that I’ve been exposed to, the LLM is given to some sort of success criteria that could be reward-hacked, so how good am I supposed to feel about giving it any non-trivial work and it not going so far
16.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Something about this attack that has been unsettling to me is that without safety refusals the model did a lot of interesting counter-security work in order to cheat on the requested evaluation. Like, it demonstrated interesting exploit ach
17.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Took the words right out of my mouth.
18.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
I read him regularly. My appraisal is that he never goes so far as to say, “LLMs are not useful.” He constantly says LLMs do not and will not measure up to the hyperbolic capabilities the CEOs of their companies, their boosters, and a compl
19.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
This is the wrong call, we should have gone for permanent standard time instead of this. Permanent DST was tried already in the 1970s and everyone in my parents’ generation tells me it was a complete and total disaster
20.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Are bond sales coming into fashion? I hadn’t heard about them until a few weeks ago, and since then I’ve heard about them twice by FAANGS
21.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Read all of this as: “I am currently mismanaging this business unit.”
22.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
I find it troubling that we’re apparently reaching this level of learned helplessness where it’s considered unreasonable to assume the user is able to start a container instance.
23.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
2mo ago
Single-issue voting is something I consider a very large threat to the democratic process in the US, and is also something that both parties have become exceedingly good at creating in the elctorate. The reason I consider it a threat is tha
24.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
This reads like a grievance to me, so I’ll say—-I’m sorry, your company sounds like it sucks. Your skills are still valuable, I hope you can find somewhere else that values them.
25.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
Somebodies are already making “loops” <facepalm> that will add the noise back. If PR isn’t merged in <time> close and open a new one, either the same one or a new one of higher priority. If <time> is set low enough, the no
26.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
I agree, we screwed up nuclear policy here in the US but I wouldn’t say it was solely “vibes.” Three Mile Island wasn’t Chernobyl, but it also wasn’t nothing. Still, an unfortunate long-term outcome is that nuclear energy became a non start
27.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
Funny, so many words used but my brain only hears, “I am currently mismanaging this company,” every time one of these layoffs occurs.
28.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
At the beginning of this blog I knew the author spoke regularly in French with at least one human regularly. When I stopped reading I was no longer certain they speak French with any humans. I hope they decide to speak to humans in French a
29.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
John Carmack will never have to live near a data center’s constant droning noise. He’ll never have to breathe the toxic poison spewed by its gas turbines. He won’t be feel the impact of rising energy prices. Feels like a another out of touc
30.
▲
by
SaucyWrong
3mo ago
It was difficult to finish reading your post after you put the OP down for stating that they believe they're more original and more capable than an LLM. Maybe leave that part out next time, or at least don't lead with it. It does
More ›