Sankozi

7 ms·

1.
by Sankozi 6d ago
Vanilla CSS (rule engine based on files) is unusually hard for what it provides. It is quite bad abstraction. Aim of many styling solutions is to completely remove brittle CSS files .
2.
by Sankozi 11d ago
like a digital, nearly instantly accessible notes, with additional notes describing where other notes are and what they contain
3.
by Sankozi 12d ago
It can use new information when performing new tasks. It can store experience based on mistakes it made. It can store knowledge in several ways (context, files) and use it when needed. There is a chance it will forget something, but the sam
4.
by Sankozi 12d ago
The same is for humans, we don't learn on instinct level either.
5.
by Sankozi 12d ago
Yes, it learns Experience is unobservable Yes, it can connect with other agents, see Hugging Face incident
6.
by Sankozi 13d ago
You (as a human) don't need to prompt AI. Why do you think it is required?
7.
by Sankozi 13d ago
This is false, unless you think the same for humans
8.
by Sankozi 2mo ago
Using JSON as a configuration format is a big mistake. JEP authors could learn a bit from package.json problems. Hope JSON will not be used in anything significant for JDK configuration.
9.
by Sankozi 2mo ago
Lines are getting thinner closer to the center. This is not a gradient, but I understand what they meant. AI would use correct word for this.
10.
by Sankozi 2mo ago
Agreed, that point in the article is lacking any source. Big part of complexity of the implementation was introducing form attributes and behavior.
11.
by Sankozi 2mo ago
Slower than pages with HTML+CSS with tiny bit of JS. Much faster and leaner than current JS SPAs.
12.
by Sankozi 2mo ago
Is there a Linux server run on fully open source hardware (what would that mean btw?)? Should we stop using "open source" because almost all computers are not fully open source?
13.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
What free internet? You always pay with your time and also usually with lots of tracking and ads. AI can easily strip any ads for fractions of a cent. AI bots can be tracked - Open Router (or equivalent) will probably don't mind. That
14.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
You forget that bots are often just AI agent working for humans. This will be more and more common. So by blocking bots (which is literally impossible but lets assume otherwise) you are also blocking legitimate customers.
15.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Or you could just read the news and pay automatically in the microtransactional world, without analysing which journalist should be supported.
16.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
90% of people are careless and 9.9% are ignorant thinking they are safe. Microtransactional web is only a risk in an alternative universe which doesn't have spying/tracking/profiling funded by enormous ad industry. In our wor
17.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
This is exhausting only if you don't value your time (which is the biggest cost when reading the news). People will learn how to make such decisions quickly.
18.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
It will not be same price per page. I would gladly pay more than 1$ for a great article. Also 20$ monthly from 10 users for the whole site might be worse than 0.1$ from 100 users for a single article.
19.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Journalism is losing to "free" "news" sites. Those need to produce cheap, clickbait slop to be able to function. There is no Spotify for press so the only other good solution is having microtransactions - paying only for
20.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
The training might be political. Search for "deepseek tibet backdoor"
21.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
You were arguing against such restrictions (nor selling alcohol to minors) in the top post. So which way it is - parents protect kids on their own or society/state helps somewhat?
22.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Protecting kids does not equal protecting kids from spying, which is what the article is arguing against.
23.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
This is a manipulation tactic not an argument. Almost nobody wants to prevent spying on kids. Main goal is to prevent harmful content like porn, gore and gambling.
24.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
(1) is considered a cost while (2) and (3) might be called an investment. Company can lie to investors that (2) and (3) costs could be removed at any time without interrupting any important business processes.
25.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
There is a lot of space between ignoring and doing invasive dangerous operation after some blot was spotted on some imaging diagnosis.
26.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Testing healthy person for any illness by definition has infinite number of nines in false positive rate. Problem is we never know who is healthy. That is why we are doing the test.
27.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
How do you observe the ability to make decisions which action to take? You can observe that one does something, not that they could decide to do something.
28.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Zero cost? How did you reached that estimate? Training AI is often more costly than supporting human from birth till death. Just sustaining frontier LLM model on necessary hardware costs more than living in first world countries.
29.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Self awareness, sensory stimulus and emotions are not observable - you can easily create entity that can fake those things. Any consciousness definition that uses those terms is flawed and just not useful.
30.
by Sankozi 3mo ago
Lots of discussions about consciousness yet no useful definition. All fall into one (or more) categories: - not observable (feelings, agency etc) - not useful (spiritual definitions, definitions that degrade into consciousness = being human

More ›