Sandman

5 ms·

1.
Does Speaking to Agents Like Cavemen Save 65% of Tokens? We Test(blog.jetbrains.com)
46 points by Sandman 2mo ago|41 comments
2.
Beyond the Prompt: Claude Code(arps18.github.io)
3 points by Sandman 4mo ago|0 comments
3.
AGI won't automate most jobs–because they're not worth the trouble(fortune.com)
11 points by Sandman 6mo ago|1 comments
4.
European Commission cloud breach: a supply-chain compromise(cert.europa.eu)
17 points by Sandman 6mo ago|0 comments
5.
Longplayer(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by Sandman 3y ago|0 comments
6.
Learn electronics by practice(beletronics.wordpress.com)
424 points by Sandman 3y ago|79 comments
7.
Print an Arduino-Powered Color Mechanical Television(spectrum.ieee.org)
62 points by Sandman 4y ago|5 comments
8.
Ideas from 2021(safalniveshak.com)
1 points by Sandman 5y ago|0 comments
9.
BlueTeam CheatSheet Log4Shell(gist.github.com)
2 points by Sandman 5y ago|0 comments
10.
GameStop Frenzy Reaches Biden and Powell as Hedge Funds Squeezed(bloomberg.com)
3 points by Sandman 6y ago|1 comments
11.
by Sandman 6y ago
Should super then also be a method argument?
12.
by Sandman 6y ago
Wouldn't it be more explicit if there was a designated keyword that objects could use to access their own members instead of implicitly assuming that any first argument to a method is a reference to them, only called 'self' b
13.
by Sandman 6y ago
I'm genuinely sorry if I came across as condescending, that was not my intention at all. I merely wanted to point out that, in my opinion, this property should be reflected in parameter type, rather than the name. Just like, if we want
14.
by Sandman 6y ago
I don't think this is a naming issue at all. In the provided example, 'Accuracy' is the correct name for the parameter, as that's what the parameter represents, accuracy. The fact that accuracy should be given as a value
15.
by Sandman 6y ago
Also, obligatory SMBC: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2009-08-30
16.
by Sandman 6y ago
Croatian here. You're correct, if you only said the word "spomenik" to anybody from former Yugoslavia, they wouldn't be able to distinguish whether you're talking about precisely those monuments built after WW2, or
17.
by Sandman 6y ago
then there is no point switching Why not? Your chances of choosing the correct door were 1 in 3 from the start. That doesn't change with the fact that the host opens the doors at random.
18.
by Sandman 6y ago
If you only ever offered the players to switch if they picked the car, they'd soon realize this and never switch when they're offered this chance. Also, players that picked a goat at first would have no chance of winning the car.
19.
C++ creator hates that Bitcoin was written in the language he made(thenextweb.com)
2 points by Sandman 7y ago|0 comments
20.
by Sandman 7y ago
Cool, I didn't know about that one! I'm going to check it out, thanks for the link!
21.
The Arrogance of the Anthropocene(theatlantic.com)
59 points by Sandman 7y ago|45 comments
22.
by Sandman 7y ago
> I suspect you don't know actual American military personnel very well, especially officers and NCOs, and how seriously we take the Laws of Warfare, AND the Constitution. You're right, I don't. But, if Americans don'
23.
by Sandman 7y ago
> the ability to defend yourself against a tyrannical dictatorship made sense until the government developed better technology, now it's pointless so just give up your guns? Basically, yes. Do you honestly think people would have an
24.
Learning the Hard Way: Microservices(medium.com)
3 points by Sandman 7y ago|0 comments
25.
by Sandman 7y ago
A student came to his master. "Great master" he said "You are wise and know many things. But tell me this: What is the sound of one hand clapping?" The master slapped him. At that moment, the student attained enlightenme
26.
Malicious Python libraries targeting Linux servers removed from PyPI(zdnet.com)
3 points by Sandman 7y ago|0 comments
27.
Brazilians love baby talk(bbc.com)
1 points by Sandman 8y ago|0 comments
28.
People can die from giving up the fight(eurekalert.org)
2 points by Sandman 8y ago|0 comments
29.
by Sandman 8y ago
I'd wager Dickens didn't have anybody stand over his shoulder, watching if he's delivering page after page at a fast enough rate.
30.
The Tragedy of Craftsmanship(blog.cleancoder.com)
4 points by Sandman 8y ago|0 comments

More ›