Samson_Corwell

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > Then don’t buy a phone from a company with a piss poor record of customer service. That is not an argument.
2. 2.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > That's a ridiculous constraint to put on the freedom to enter into contracts. Then it's a good thing this doesn't do that. Instead, all it would do is take away enforcement of non-disparagement clauses. That gives people
3. 3.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > She didn't have to agree to the contract. Everyone is aware of that. > I don't really want some arbitrary govt limit restricting what private parties can do with each other. Great! Then you surely don't want the gover
4. 4.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > She can just reject the offer. Nothing can compel you to sign a contract you don't want to. Not an argument. Yes, she can reject the offer. The guy up top is saying that the non-disparagement clause shouldn't be enforced, a c
5. 5.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > Sorry, what was forced about the NDA? > Did I miss the part where a gun was held to their head? She was not forced to sign the NDA. That is correct. Take note, however, that she would still be forcibly silenced by the government if
6. 6.▲
   by Samson_Corwell 5mo ago

   > That's nice, but the rest of us didn't accept anything to agree to provide a legal system that would enforce it... and there's no reason we should. This is exactly the kind of response with the right amount of flippancy&