Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Sae5waip
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Or not.
2.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
0, in a suitable color space.
3.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
> If this is what EA is doing then they had better have a really good explanation. Or?
4.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
The problem with S/MIME is that it is strictly hierarchical. That already hasn't worked well for TLS. The aim of email encryption is in a large part to prevent government-level parties from reading the emails. It doesn't real
5.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Here are some problems, from the top of my head, in no particular order: - Subjects can't be encrypted. - Encrypted mailing lists are complicated. Do you reencrypt in the middle? What software do you use? The mailing list man
6.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
As a German, I feel very much the same.
7.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Because modern configuration management tools like Ansible (or Puppet, or Salt, or whatever) allow you to do more things more easily. Also, because Bash is a particularly horrible language. I have a lot of experience writing bash scripts, a
8.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
HN is a YC marketing tool, it pays for itself quite easily.
9.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
The article has nothing to do with Snowden. At all.
10.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Yes, but it's easier to teach admins to never use "PermitRootLogin yes" "because it's bad for security" than to teach them to never use weak passwords.
11.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Automated 0-day attack: fair point. Though direct remote code execution is probably much, much more likely than authentication bypass.
12.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
@Passwordless sudo: Because then you have effectively made your user root, and compromising your user account is enough to get root access immediately. If you do that, then why have a seperate user at all?[3] @Partitions: Seperating /h
13.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
tl;dr: "disallow root login entirely, everything else is bad" is cargo culting. I said "impractical", not "impossible". Of course I can use sudo. But it's more work. I require root access a lot. It adds up
14.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Did you ever stop and think about this or are you just repeating something you read on "Hacker""news"? Getting by /without/ direct SSH root access is often impractical (think about scp), and without-password is
15.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Because then root login would be disabled entirely. With "without-password" SSH-key based login is still possible (and no, that's not much of a security risk).
16.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Electrically powered multicopters can carry DSLRs quite easily. If it's supposed to carry expensive equipment, you'll want to use a hexa- or octocopter though. Of course multicopter flight times, especially with payloads, are prob
17.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a company index.
18.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
I don't. So is mine, but resizing it for each individual website is unnecessary work. And some websites have a legitimate need for a wider format, so you can't even say "all websites should be like this".
19.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Anyone want to host their mission critical project with a team so small that individual employees have to be on call 24/7? If the company requires more than what can be done in a 40-hour work week, it should hire more employees.
20.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
That's precisely why you only use subkeys in daily life and only use the root key for keysigning (and ideally store it safely and offline).
21.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
That maybe nghst should take a step back from HN and consider that normal people may find the original 2048 fun and may not care about its variants at all. Giving an example is a perfectly valid way to make a point. Circumstantial doesn
22.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
It's you. Linux has followed a bi-monthly schedule for quite a while now. FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Maintenance
23.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
No, I don't. a) We (my country and the US) are allies . b) I may be less not ok with spying on high-ranking politicians. But any spying on companies and normal citizens is right out.
24.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
Unfortunately, I have a huge problem with a foreign country - the USA - spying on my country and me.
25.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
And only for domestic spying. People that aren't US citizens still get no protection at all.
26.
▲
by
Sae5waip
12y ago
> If you meet me in person and I say "I'm sgentle", that's a weaker proof than if I post a comment from this account. That's why (for PGP) you, as an assurer, generally don't upload the signature yourself bu
27.
▲
by
Sae5waip
13y ago
Seriously? a) You'd just write your take next to the link, instead of hiding it behind. Your example is far-fetched. b) This is obviously meant for ads. (And the examples on their landing page make that perfectly clear.) Quote: "
28.
▲
by
Sae5waip
13y ago
It can not be used with good intentions. There is never any advantage for the users who click on the links.
29.
▲
by
Sae5waip
13y ago
I'd like to add that "everyone else is doing it too" is commonly used by governments like the US to "excuse" their spying.
30.
▲
by
Sae5waip
13y ago
I've recently seen a presentation about attacks on a widely used system used in current cars. There are a couple of different ways that are significantly better than brute force (as in: works against real cars in seconds to a few minut
More ›