Ryoku

7 ms·

1.
by Ryoku 12y ago
Wow. I'm sad to admit we see a LOT of this kind of job posts in my city (Mexico city, Mexico). And they get plenty of answers too.
2.
by Ryoku 12y ago
I am entertained by the relation between the last two quotes in the article.
3.
Dr. Oz to testify about weight loss scams in front of the Senate.(scienceblogs.com)
2 points by Ryoku 12y ago|0 comments
4.
The case for banning laptops in the classroom.(newyorker.com)
1 points by Ryoku 12y ago|0 comments
5.
by Ryoku 12y ago
I find it interesting how focused this article is in the "traditional" male gender role. It doesn't even touch the subject of different friendship types and relations when involving other genders than 'male'. Withou
6.
by Ryoku 12y ago
I would be worried about the health of your computer. My work's T420 lenovo doesn't seem to lag THAT much, in fact, I hadn't noticed much of it until I got to read the comments here... Scratch that, just after I wrote last pa
7.
by Ryoku 12y ago
So, if your home is out of energy you're locked out? I don't know how common that is in USA. But where I live, you'd be trapped under an hours-long storm while waiting for the power to come back during rain season.
8.
by Ryoku 13y ago
It keeps hitting me... If you're doing something wrong, why would you be wearing your badge?
9.
by Ryoku 13y ago
That is correct. Facebook campaigns don't work for actual conversions. But it is in large part due to the casual way most users navigate the website; which is not going to change. Fake accounts or not you will get a large amount of use
10.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I was waiting to find an article clearly speaking about this; which I think is the elephant in the room when it comes to female tech founders. The issue, as it points out, is not being able to hack; or being able to learn, etc. Society has
11.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Congratulations Dave, very nice work. I've been toying with the idea of starting to develop many small mobile and web apps during the course of next year, not really looking for revenue but for the sake of creating tools and games that
12.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I think it is less secure because it centralizes all the security in one single layer. AKA the email address you are using to handle the credentials. Once you have access to that email, then you have access to everything. Contrary to what h
13.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Well, I think we are talking about two completely different points and, per your past response, that nothing I've said really makes sense to you. Of course I think the solution is useful from a UX perspective, it's awesome. But fr
14.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I'm glad you have a portable device which you can use to access your email. Not every user does. But you're right. Please use and implement candy security structures.
15.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Yes. But it also, I think, makes it easier to follow certain attack patterns that are already known and commonly used. For example, setting an email forwarder to an account an attacker controls in most cases won't even be noticed. I th
16.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Compromising one email account is easier than compromising several credentials.
17.
by Ryoku 13y ago
It was just an example. My point is, by relaying all entrance control to an email, you are giving it master password access. The only thing you are doing is relaying the security issues to wherever that email is hosted; most of the times, a
18.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Then a new and huge list of security problems arises when you have to bother the user with getting a new code every time if they have the sense of closing their browser and cleaning their cookies each time they close their browser (which co
19.
by Ryoku 13y ago
At this point, airport security is there to make people feel safe. That's it. Do you really think a plane full of people who know they will die unless they do something about it, will let a terrorist get away with it? On the other han
20.
Bitcoin as a Ponzi Scheme (?)(dailydot.com)
1 points by Ryoku 13y ago|0 comments
21.
by Ryoku 13y ago
This is not related to the topic in question.
22.
by Ryoku 13y ago
This is one of the worse ideas I've heard of; security wise. Not even at a tech-level. All your data and credentials are a robbery away. Of course, if you get robbed you can probably call in your credit cards from your cellphone... oh
23.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I just have one issue with this. It's a social engineering gold mine.
24.
by Ryoku 13y ago
This is idea makes my shoulder surfing senses wet. Seriously, it might sound like a good UX idea in theory, but lets go to practice: People are not going to use that button in the safety of their homes. Why? Because they don't care.
25.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I don't see anything surprising here... Pick a government, any government, do you really think they don't recruit their best hackers for such team? Or was the general thought that only China's gov makes viruses to target othe
26.
Dangers of computers in objects that did not have computers.[TXT](thediplomat.com)
1 points by Ryoku 13y ago|0 comments
27.
by Ryoku 13y ago
Wow. This has just turned into a great example for one of my classes. I don't think there's a better way (other than hands-on examples) to show the severity and widespread of such security holes.
28.
by Ryoku 13y ago
I have to agree with pudo. Sending a user's email to a third party service has many privacy implications. I don't care if you share, not share, store, not store, or whatever; users are trusting you not to share their emails and yo
29.
by Ryoku 13y ago
That's pretty interesting, I didn't know of those services.
30.
Did I find a phishing link from pakistan.gov.pk?(ryoku-weil.biz)
1 points by Ryoku 13y ago|2 comments

More ›