Rolivaw

13 ms·

1.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
I agree more with this type or reasoning. He or his administration knows full well that they are holding all the aces. So the Chinese can pretend to play tsun tzu all they want, US just needs to hold. Currently it’s looking much worse for c
2.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
The short answer is china doesn’t have a lot of options. It’s not clear what leverage they can find, I’m guessing they just don’t want to seem weak and give in. Trade is so unfair the US has practically nothing to lose. China is actually k
3.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
I guess we do disagree. The way I think about it is what gets us to from point A to point B in the least amount of time is best. All other solutions aren’t real not the least because china and India aren’t going to play ball. Also because
4.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
Most of what you mention are sustainability propositions, which are not useful long term, probably not even short term. We can’t create sustainability, it’s a fad we’ve all been fed, based on anthropometric views of the world which aren’t g
5.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
There aren’t good solutions yet. That’s a cold hard fact. Reducing emission isn’t going to help and it’s not a start. It’s a losers battle. We need carbon sequestering tech, fusion, and new tech to solve this.
6.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
High output management. Andy grove. Not a page turner as the mainstream airport management books but useful, unlike those fluffy pastries.
7.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
I NEED one of this for Richard Feynman! Every time I read something of his I try hard to imagine his accent and style.
8.
by Rolivaw 7y ago
I’ve hired quite a few people and networked through upwork.com