Rockslide

8 ms·

1.
by Rockslide 11mo ago
Just Dance Vance's shitposting doesn't even qualify as "ideas".
2.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Figuring out what is true for npm v5 is quite the waste of time, given that we are currently at v11. And that's what this ancient stackoverflow thread is about. npm certainly has a troubled past, otherwise we wouldn't have yarn an
3.
by Rockslide 1y ago
npm install does install the exact versions from the lockfile. Even though this misconception gets repeated in every single thread about npm here on hn. npm install will not randomly update your direct dependencies, let alone transitive dep
4.
by Rockslide 1y ago
That first recommendation of pinning exact versions of each and every dependency is borderline insane. That's exactly what lockfiles are for. Which are used by default.
5.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Well there are other lockfile updates as well, which aren't dependency version changes either. e.g. if the lockfile was created with an older npm version, running npm install with a newer npm version might upgrade it to a newer lockfil
6.
by Rockslide 1y ago
> You've partially answered your own question here. Is that the case? If it were ever true (outside of outright bugs in npm), it must have been many many years and major npm releases ago. So that doesn't justify brigading outda
7.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Yes. As someone who's using npm install daily, and given the update cadence of npm packages, I would end up with dirty lock files very frequently if the parent statement were true. It just doesn't happen.
8.
by Rockslide 1y ago
How does this get repeated over and over, when it's simply not true? At least not anymore. npm install will only update the lockfile if you make changes to your package.json. Otherwise, it will install the versions from the lockfile.
9.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Those stackoverflow posts are ancient and many major npm releases old, so in other words: irrelevant. That blog post is somewhat up to date but also very vague about the circumstances which would update the lockfile. Which certainly isn&#x2
10.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Well but the docs you cited don't match what you stated. You can delete node_modules and reinstall, it will never update the package-lock.json, you will always end up with the exact same versions as before. The package-lock updating ha
11.
by Rockslide 1y ago
> What's next We're improving the developer experience in three distinct phases: Framework -> Design -> Cloud So the "cloud" part is where the enshittification will begin. Been there, done that, switched away fr
12.
by Rockslide 1y ago
You have that mixed up, storage and ingestion is cheap in BigQuery but processing is exactly were they grab $$$
13.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Yes the whole consultancy situation really is the icing on the cake - as the customer you pay for (alleged) experts in the field and get this as the result...
14.
by Rockslide 1y ago
Sorry but that's nonsense. Partitioning is THE central cost controlling mechanism in BigQuery and the docs clearly state this. And it's an easy to use feature, so I'm not sure what makes you think using that would be as chall
15.
by Rockslide 1y ago
I don't have a lot of sympathy for people using their tools wrong. Using partitioning surely would have prevented this.
16.
by Rockslide 5y ago
Adding a contact form to a statically generated website - that's what I use it for (all email goes to a single predefined account)
17.
by Rockslide 5y ago
it literally says "same project" right there
18.
by Rockslide 6y ago
> If that is all you're going to put there, then just leave it blank. Well, I would love to. Unfortunately neither Play Store nor App Store allow you to do that... so "bug fixes and performance improvements" it is, 99% of
19.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Tradegate is even 08-22...
20.
by Rockslide 6y ago
It was on German n-tv. Although they now state the opposite here: https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/der_boersen_tag/Arger-ueber-F...
21.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Trading has continued hours ago, probably even before this article was even published. In a first statement, they blamed algo-traders which created (and within milliseconds deleted) a ton of pointless orders, like buying Wirecard for 0,05EU
22.
by Rockslide 6y ago
GB never joined the Eurozone. So what does Target2 have to do with any of that mentioned in the article?
23.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Is that true though? The Deluge currently appears to not be buyable anywhere here, and if I bought it directly from them in NZ and add import tax to that, it probably won't be that much cheaper than a OP-1, if at all. And then the Delu
24.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Exactly! You worded it better than I did :)
25.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Spending money doesn't "hurt" as much when the goods you spent it on don't lose value, that's all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I might regret having bought it if you can get it for 200 bucks in 5 years. I will not regret it if yo
26.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Yes it's expensive in some ways and in others it isn't. Can you get a better synth for the money? Sure. Can you get a better sampler for the money? Sure. Can you get a better sequencer for the money? Sure. Can you get a decent syn
27.
by Rockslide 6y ago
> Clock hand question is painfully obvious once you look at actual analog clock face. You see, intuitively I thought this would involve some kind of radian maths (just because it's about angles and a circle) and I don't remembe
28.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Well, when you work at Google, at least you must have passed that kind of an interview at one point - which is something I'm fairly certain I wouldn't be able to do.
29.
by Rockslide 6y ago
I have no doubts that _some_ people working at Google are top of their field. But that hardly applies to all of their workforce...
30.
by Rockslide 6y ago
Reading that stuff always makes me feel incredibly stupid (or rather clueless). I wouldn't be able to answer most of those questions off the top of my head. Including this weird clock hand question (which is probably some trivial math

More ›