Rochus

7 ms·

1.
by Rochus 5d ago
Cool, thanks for sharing. Shannon was a bit too optimistic about when all this should happen, but he essentially describes what we have today, 65 years later.
2.
by Rochus 5d ago
They also seem to use a different encoding scheme which has more bandwidth and less artefacts up front. If you download a WAV from Suno, you still essentially have MP3 quality, just serialized to a WAV file. The elevenlabs WAV has full audi
3.
by Rochus 5d ago
Great sound quality, definitely better than Suno 5 and 6. It let me download a WAV file which goes unfiltered up to 20kHz (Suno goes to ~15kHz and has more artefacts). Here is my first attempt: http://rochus-keller.ch/Divers
4.
by Rochus 6d ago
> but as soon as they get good, then any human composition will be completely devalued I think it will take many more years until an AI is able to compose like e.g. John Williams and play a score and sound like e.g. the London Symphony O
5.
by Rochus 7d ago
Just listened to some v6 samples on https://suno.com/labs/genre-wheel Sound quality doesn't seem to have improved, especially the grand pianos still sound detuned. I hear new musical and sound features such as wil
6.
by Rochus 9d ago
To the point, thanks.
7.
by Rochus 9d ago
What misconception? The administration wrote themselves few years ago: https://www.edoeb.admin.ch/de/07032023-bundesverwaltung-fueh... Now (eventually) they seem to reconsider that this dependability might not have bee
8.
by Rochus 9d ago
Wouldn't a true Swiss person be neutral and cautious, and wouldn't they refrain from parroting all sorts of nonsense in public about other countries? Anyway, it doesn’t exactly seem like smart move when a government agency tasked
9.
by Rochus 10d ago
Doesn't look like really a "v2" to me, rather v1 a bit re-arranged. A true "theory" able to explain present music (or even Jazz from the seventies) and also support its creation is still widely lacking, or just a na
10.
by Rochus 12d ago
This is amazing. How is this possible? RocksDB seems to have much more development resources than TidesDB, isn't it?
11.
by Rochus 12d ago
I agree that transclusion, particularly based on byte offsets, is not very useful for the WWW. But the concept is much more useful than what the author suggests. Maybe you have heard of Ivar Jacobson's Objectory tool. I worked with it
12.
by Rochus 17d ago
Cool. So at least the work-hours haven't changed much since ;-)
13.
by Rochus 17d ago
Looks interesting. But I couldn't find any practical examples or tutorials so far. Any hints? Is there a description somewhere how it is implemented, i.e. what technical concepts are used to analyze the Midi, understand the music well
14.
by Rochus 19d ago
> Rust is an enormously more complex language I have no doubt that a Rust compiler can be implemented in C. But it's a different project to write one in C from start than trying to migrate an existing C++14 based project to C. The f
15.
by Rochus 19d ago
That's fascinating. I spent significant time with early MUMPS and the machines of the time ( https://github.com/rochus-keller/mumps/ ) which had a comparable amount of memory. Was your whole insurance applicati
16.
by Rochus 19d ago
Sounds pretty difficult (if not impossible, see cfront 4.0) to translate C++ code to C89. You have to keep track of all constructors and destructors and their progress along the body yourself, and I assume it must be fit for exceptions as w
17.
by Rochus 19d ago
Well, it might not be your actual problem. But there are always people who look a little further beyond the horizon.
18.
by Rochus 19d ago
This project is not pointless at all. It's not about "reproducible builds", but about building a full present system from "first principles". It would be a way out of a significant dependability problem barely anyon
19.
by Rochus 19d ago
> If anyone has ideas/cheaper ways to run it I would like to know GCC 4.7.4 was the last version of GCC fully written in C, with full C++98/03 support and a decent subset of C++11. As far as I know it is used by the bootstrap p
20.
by Rochus 20d ago
Thanks for these interesting insights. It's hard to imagine today how scarce computers actually were at that time. The assembler was for the System/360?
21.
by Rochus 20d ago
This is a very interesting talk. I'm amazed to hear how good this AI stuff already is (if I take DHH's statements at face value).
22.
by Rochus 23d ago
Well, since everyone already has the specs, they should release it as a free standard.
23.
by Rochus 23d ago
"Buy now - 10$"
24.
by Rochus 23d ago
Cool project. Good idea to use SDL3; it brings along much more than SDL2 where you had to use a lot of other libraries to become platform independent with all features. The disadvantage might be that SDL3 itself (as SLD2) is pretty big. Ada
25.
by Rochus 26d ago
Have a look at boost::movelib::unique_ptr<T> which works well with C++98/03.
26.
by Rochus 26d ago
I guess people will avoid this country/island alltogether when these such sentences get commonly known. Maybe that was the intention, i.e. to reduce overcrowding due to tourism?
27.
by Rochus 26d ago
Interesting. Since I have the T480 I have to switch off variable speed when doing benchmarks and switch off all but one core.
28.
by Rochus 28d ago
Have a look at Qt implicit sharing. There is/was also a Boost library which could do most of it long before c++11.
29.
by Rochus 29d ago
For all of my projects it is good enough. C++11 onwards has a few advantages, but I don't need them. Moving ownership between containers to avoid allocations was possible with the standard library even before C++11, and Qt offered &quo
30.
by Rochus 1mo ago
Very interesting summary of facts and quotations with conclusions. I would say there are even more camps than the two mentioned. Personally I think C++98 and Qt5 just worked and were good enough for all purposes, and C++ since has become an

More ›