Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RoboticWater
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
RoboticWater
4y ago
> Streaming services have already stopped publishing entire seasons, going back to the TV model of an episode a week. This is to prevent people from subscribing to a service, watching a whole season, then canceling the service. It's
2.
▲
by
RoboticWater
5y ago
The difference here is that the slogans you listed are usually euphemisms for something more insidious. Anti-work and defund the police are the exact opposite—deliberately inflammatory slogans that exaggerate (if not outright contradict) th
3.
▲
by
RoboticWater
5y ago
For all the use cases I deal with on a regular basis, Svelte looks more like vanilla HTML/JS than any equivalent React code. And the reason these things change is because that's what needed changing . One of the topline features
4.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
This is significantly more than a "handful" of hillbillies trying to upend the legal results of the presidential election following the explicit rhetoric of the incumbent, and unless I'm mistaken, this riot began after one of
5.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
> Physics isn't used as a catch-all to explain things that haven't been researched. Has systemic racism not been researched? I feel like you're just grasping at semantic straws here. Systemic racism is a theory , like any
6.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
I don't see how. If men are perceived as being stronger and more rational, that will help them in acquiring jobs, but hurt them when being found culpable of a crime. I'm not sure where you learned feminist theory, but it's fa
7.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
Physics is also a purposefully nebulous term used to capture and group a collection of specific issues that can be measured. God forbid people want to group together racial disparities caused by institutional practices under the term "
8.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
See, this just comes off as reactionary, as if saying "I believe in systemic racism" somehow secretly casts a vote for progressive policies behind your back. Is it really so hard to say "I believe that our institutions are sy
9.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
> No one has put forth the argument that Sowell believes systematic racism cannot ever exist. The comment I was responding to literally said "It is immeasurable, undefinable, unchangeable. As a propagandist you must take care to use
10.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
Of course, patriarch theory completely accounts for this. The common view that men are more powerful and autonomous, and therefore dangerous, can probably account for some degree of their harsher treatment under the justice system, just lik
11.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
I was honestly unaware of the difference. Upon looking up the term on Wikipedia, the first line is "Institutional racism (also known as systemic racism)." Every subsequent article I looked at under the google search "systemic
12.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
I'm not debating Sowell—I don't have the background to dispute his claims, I'm arguing against the notion that systemic racism is "immeasurable, undefinable, unchangeable" and is thus propaganda. Researchers might b
13.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
If it were immeasurable and undefinable, then we wouldn't have studies showing disproportionate sentencing of Black people [1] or the persistent negative effects of redlining [2]. And if it were unchangeable, we wouldn't be able t
14.
▲
by
RoboticWater
6y ago
The argument is that the electorate can't vote on policy unless they can see those policies in action. Voters can rest on the dogmatic idea that private markets solve everything without ever having to experience the effects of privatiz
15.
▲
by
RoboticWater
8y ago
I can't seem to find any data which suggests that Liberal Arts majors are significantly more likely to fall for climate change denial or the anti-vax movement. I find that most studies correlate political leaning with these beliefs, no
16.
▲
by
RoboticWater
8y ago
Form _is_ function in a visual medium. If I can't easily parse the information in front of me, then the content is useless; my eyes will just glaze over. That's why we have design in the first place. I can't stand MPFR's
17.
▲
by
RoboticWater
8y ago
They probably don't; I doubt many designers are thinking "wow, I really want to inundate my user with pop-ups," it's more that analysts have likely got numbers showing that having x calls to action yields y% more subscri
18.
▲
by
RoboticWater
9y ago
Compared to what? Yes, we can rest on the technicality that science is only an ever-expanding and ever-solidifying theory, but can't–by fallibility of perception–ever reach perfect truth. So what though. What else do we have to go on?
19.
▲
by
RoboticWater
9y ago
How do you expect those independent experts to be chosen? Even then, how do expect these experts to "objectively address" the issue? I don't agree with partisan politics, but the solution isn't demanding independent, mag
20.
▲
by
RoboticWater
9y ago
The argument is two-pronged (probably more, but let's restrict it to two): firstly, yes, that diversity can improve gains, but secondly that the current skewed proportions were created by both active and passive discrimination which, t
21.
▲
by
RoboticWater
10y ago
I fail to see how industry problems ripe for technical solutions equate to cash grabs. Problems are essentially the basis of every startup (if we generalize a little), and I can assure you that engineers can be passionate about solving a pr
22.
▲
by
RoboticWater
10y ago
There's no simple solution here. Part of the Alt-Right platform, as I have it, is that the media (be it news or social media) is corrupt and bent on silencing them. Suspending their accounts would only reinforce that belief. I would al
23.
▲
by
RoboticWater
10y ago
> Patriarchy and the fact that white males dominate the corporate world is apparently something that should be "changed" It seems to me that social superiority was part of the conversation to begin with. The OP wants to celebra
24.
▲
by
RoboticWater
10y ago
You say that like anyone can just up and go back to university or simply create their own service (presumably some new, inventive one because the one they just had is already nearly perfected by machines). Neither of those things are especi