RexFactorem

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by RexFactorem 10mo ago

   I like D better. And had some of the "cool" features of Zig from quite some time, such as scope(exit) which is clearer. I don't find Zig nearly as readable as my D code, but alas, I don't do systems programming.
2. 2.▲
   by RexFactorem 3y ago

   If ppl got the same quality of life our grandparents and maybe some parents got, I'm sure this wouldn't be a topic.
3. 3.▲
   by RexFactorem 3y ago

   I have no problema with the riffing argument they have. I do weekly updates yo muy library finding new albums and bands all the time that are just forgettable "guitar-noise". Metal has come through some dark periods where every ne
4. 4.▲
   by RexFactorem 3y ago

   It's not as simple as it shows from basic examples. Complex stuff gets weird.
5. 5.▲
   by RexFactorem 4y ago

   Zig sounds logical to me if you already know C++. It has grest WASM support, too. Stuff like Bun.sh which is an entire JS platform is built upon Zig with a very small team. That speaks of Zig complexity.
6. 6.▲
   by RexFactorem 4y ago

   Zig looks logical, It has amszong WASM support.
7. 7.▲
   by RexFactorem 4y ago

   Basically you need to be able to express your ideas simply, avoiding SE jargon as much as possible, and state how stuff either makes money or saves money. For more detailed info, here you go: https://github.com/kuchin/a