Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Repulsion9513
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
What does "picks" mean to you? Strange response. Do you think they only got one person to do it or something? If they weren't looking at multiple options then ... why did they still ask SJ? Oh right because they asked SJ beca
2.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> Self driving is actually coming along better than I thought it would. Version 12 behaves like a human driver. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Anyway that would be cool if it was true but doesn't change what a conman he is. He said he was gonn
3.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> You know that this is exactly how SpaceX won big? There were many a competent, credentialed people telling Musk that reusable rockets are a pipe dream, all the way to the first Falcon 9 landing and reflight. Some of them even continued
4.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> Offloads rendering to the GPU for lower system load My God, what have we done
5.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> > [Terminal m]ultiplexers add unnecessary overhead, suffer from a complexity cascade, because they actually have to translate escape codes, modifying them in hackish ways to get them to work with their concepts of windows/sessi
6.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
I don't see where that quote says "they contacted SJ before they hired the actor that did the voice" or anything similar. Perhaps you need to taste it a bit more before you try again. "Whether or not Altman wanted SJ
7.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
It's not aiming high when anyone competent and informed can tell him there's no way, and he pays many competent and informed people to tell him. He can set all the goals he wants. Setting a goal is not the same as telling people t
8.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> You're creating a causal connection without a proof of one. We don't know why Altman referenced "Her", but I feel it's more likely because the product works in a way eerily similar to the movie's AI, not t
9.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> When the reaction is “I don’t care that an investigation refuted some of the accusations”, it demonstrates someone isn’t openly approaching things in good faith. When the reaction is "it doesn't matter, it's still not ok
10.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
I'm not sure what RMS has to do with Altman. I'm also not sure why you think people just want to hate on Musk when it took a decade of his blatant lies for most people to catch on to the fact that he's a conman (remember, eve
11.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Ah yes, the real deal. How's that self driving coming along? How about the Cybertruck being a few years late? How about the low cost car being cancelled? How about the you have all the hardware you need - oh wait oopsie you need to pay
12.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
That may be true, but you specifically said "on this site" and now you're saying "this is not specific to this site". And no, the vast majority of people "try[ing] to pull them down" to Musk are doing it b
13.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Where has anyone disputed "that they hired the actor that did the voice months before they contacted SJ"? Links preferred please.
14.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
What part of "actor" in "voice actor" did you not understand? You don't hire an actor to play themselves generally. "SJ" was not playing herself in Her.
15.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Except the story isn't false? They wanted her voice, they got her voice*, they did marketing around her voice, but it's not her voice, she didn't want to give them her voice. Notice how the only asterisk there is "it
16.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
due to SCOTUS* "1A" describes rights of people, not businesses or organizations, and doesn't mention anything about money
17.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> Especially when the issue is providing customer support at scale to millions, if not billions of users (many of whom don't actually directly pay anything). What about those who do pay? Cause I can promise you, you don't get a
18.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
`| less`
19.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Did they? IDK, just differentiating browser from curl is incredibly likely to be "good enough" as an attacker.
20.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
I mean, the context I was replying to was: > terminals don't have even a small fraction of browsers' malicious-link-defense mechanisms (as demonstrated). I always want to see the full url in a terminal. And yeah you're rig
21.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Honestly the issue here isn't that they let the zone get stale. The root zone doesn't change that much. So a couple of TLDs had to hold off on making changes, who cares. The issue here is that they didn't notice until someone
22.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> sophisticated enough to send different contents to a browser and to curl Checking the Accept header (or User-Agent or a bunch of other things) is very difficult :)
23.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Is government a corporation?
24.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
You never want to see raw, attacker-supplied text in a terminal, actually.
25.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> The statement sounds like it's written by a lawyer to be technically true while implying something that is actually false. That describes nearly every statement to ever come out of a CEO's mouth. (Or anyone else who's pr
26.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> I guess the more ignorant ones do? I figured it was common knowledge that when something is broken policy-wise at companies, and they're clearly avoiding fixing it, it's rarely the non-management employees that are the proble
27.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
Reminds me of those contracts (that are completely formulaic and you definitely can't negotiate) that say "I agree this rate has been negotiated".
28.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
> in which case at least you cost them more than they cost you Did you really? Monetarily you did of course. How much time does it cost you though? It might cost the company a couple hours.
29.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
It has been for a long time. Back when I worked for a (moving truck) rental place they charged like $75 "for processing and billing" the tolls to you.
30.
▲
by
Repulsion9513
2y ago
If no one intended to apply the fee to an electric vehicle, then why was the fee applied to an electric vehicle? Moreover why did it happen numerous times? And why was support not immediately like "oh crap lemme fix that"?
More ›