Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Regic
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Regic
1y ago
I feel like the fact that ML has no good explanation why it works this well gives a lot of people room to invent their head-canon, usually from their field of expertise. I've seen this from exceptionally intelligent individuals too. If
2.
▲
by
Regic
2y ago
Don't we all experience this from time to time? When I'm focused on solving some mathematical problems I'm not thinking in words, but in concepts. When you are thinking of words you also think of a concept, the only differenc
3.
▲
by
Regic
2y ago
This exists and does work to some degree, e.g. Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07421-0
4.
▲
by
Regic
2y ago
My experience is mostly with gpt-4. Act like it is a beginner programmer. Give it small, self-contained tasks, explain the possible problems, limitation of the environment you are working with, possible hurdles, suggest api functions or lan
5.
▲
by
Regic
3y ago
> There were a lot of people who were just reciting the best practice rules they'd learned from blog posts, without really having the experience to know where the advice was coming from, or how best to apply it This is exactly my ex
6.
▲
by
Regic
3y ago
WPA2 also had an exploit (KRACK) while the handshake algorithm itself was "proven to be secure". Formal verification is a powerful tool but it does not guarantee bug-free code: it merely guarantees that the particular bugs you che
7.
▲
by
Regic
3y ago
Based on response times it probably just uses caching for some answers and has limited token/second toward chatgpt so it gives an error sometimes if you ask a question that needs to be forwarded.
8.
▲
by
Regic
3y ago
I'm running models locally on my 3090 and it's fast enough, although for example building a vector database can take a while. I can run LoRa training but I haven't done anything meaningful with it so far. I chose 3090 because
9.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
One possible explanation is that Putin wants to prevent a possible rival from winning over oligarchs by promising to make agreement with the eu. Many oligarchs are losing a lot of money on this war and it is likely that a coup that replaces
10.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
It would even decrease the value of their property to no fault of their own. That sounds like something the manufacturer should be responsible for.
11.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
The entangled photons can't detect the interruption alone, you need the message too. If you are interested how I suggest watching Veritasium's video about Bell's theorem as a start. The cryptographic method is called Ekert pr
12.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
Quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmit information but can be used to check if the message was interrupted, so it's still important for quantum cryptography. (I'm just a programmer but had a course quite some time ago on
13.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
Learning algorithms are also affected by experience (or data in case of supervised)
14.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
While the framework of differentiation between intranational and international interests fits, it is certainly not "for the good of the people" in this case. Orban antagonized the EU because it was unlikely that he would be punish
15.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
The hungarian leading party (fidesz) has already declared they will not veto Ukrain's adoption to the EU so I personally really doubt they would veto Finland's entry to the NATO. They are playing a double-game (sorry, this probabl
16.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
Videos usually had about 10% of the number of votes compared to views, so depending on how you define (vast) majority it is correct.
17.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
I remember watching some video and looking at dislikes: why is this downvoted this much? Pretty run of the mill video with nothing outrageous or even particularly controversial. Oh it got posted _there_... Still, I don't think this is
18.
▲
by
Regic
4y ago
I just want to point out the irony in falling back to good old centralized fintech companies to actually use the supposedly decentralized currency. Sorry, I know, off-topic.
19.
▲
by
Regic
5y ago
Source? I've seen this claim many times but is it just a feeling or is there at least a whistleblower?
20.
▲
by
Regic
5y ago
These were my exact thoughts about CS vs Quake back in the days. Quake had no downtime, all action while CS had time between rounds or just tense moments without anything actually happening. I think this dynamic was an important point behin
21.
▲
by
Regic
5y ago
Well, if you collect commits on a feature branch you can just create a new one with a slightly different name - all the commits on your branch are rewritable before you push it in and create a pull request (deleting and pushing it again wit
22.
▲
by
Regic
5y ago
I call this argument "totalitarian democracy argument". Yes, NGOs and media are not democratic, nor family, corporations, etc... Not everything is and it is fairly obvious that if everything was controlled through the goverment (s
23.
▲
by
Regic
5y ago
I think the book is still useful with all it's flaws, mainly because "overengineering code" is like exercising too much: sure, it happens to some and can be a big issue, but for the vast majority of people it's the oppos
24.
▲
by
Regic
9y ago
If the recognition is done by autoencoder network as I suspect, then generative adversarial network could break it easily.
25.
▲
by
Regic
9y ago
My guess would be that they trained an autoencoder network for facial recognition and they use the encoder part for fingerprinting and check images by the decoder part. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoencoder
26.
▲
by
Regic
9y ago
I'm developing driver assistance functions for vehicles and I have experience using simulink, although not anymore, fortunately. It's usage is converging slowly but steadily to zero in the company I work for, although we still use
27.
▲
by
Regic
9y ago
Yes, it is sarcastic: "As a seller (only) myself, I am one of the many victims of this scam."
28.
▲
by
Regic
10y ago
Maybe the problem is not where we search for it. There is a theory that willpower is a limited resource [1]. If this theory is true, it means productivity hacks cannot work, because the problem is not in our weekends, it is in our weekdays: