ReK_

5 ms·

1.
by ReK_ 2y ago
Except it's not 16 million containers. You need addressing for every link in the network. Want 10 racks of 20 servers with redundant switching in each, redundant spines in the network rack? That's 60 physical links, each of which
2.
by ReK_ 2y ago
That's only true if you aren't behind CG-NAT. If you are, your firewall can port forward all it wants but it won't matter, the ISP would have to also port forward to you.
3.
by ReK_ 2y ago
You sure about that? > They also say they can share your personal information with dealers (there are lots of those around for sure), social media platforms, advertising companies, joint marketing partners, SIRIUS XM radio service, law e
4.
by ReK_ 2y ago
I guess theoretically phishing could be considered MiTM, but the latter term generally implies the attack is fully transparent to the user, whereas phishing convinces the user to insert the malicious party themselves.
5.
by ReK_ 2y ago
Because banks are financial institutions and every decision they make is based in that. If the cost of insurance is less than the cost to actually secure the system, they will choose that every time. Banks and payment processors have some o
6.
by ReK_ 2y ago
Check out trakt.tv
7.
by ReK_ 2y ago
I wrote something to bulk download my library from Bandcamp and actually packaged it as an excuse to mess with github actions: https://github.com/ReK42/bcamp-dl
8.
by ReK_ 3y ago
You're thinking of SSH keys, which are not certificates. SSH certificates are indeed x.509: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6187
9.
Animating XKCD #1335 with HTML5(gist.github.com)
3 points by ReK_ 13y ago|0 comments