RayVR

7 ms·

1.
by RayVR 25d ago
I’m constantly disappointed by Anthropic’s models. I become more disillusioned every day. It seems like, by having the models write Python code, they tend to write Python code like an average developer. Which is to say, quite bad. Add in th
2.
by RayVR 1mo ago
This is different from the Mouser open source app for Logitech?
3.
by RayVR 2mo ago
My own experience is that with the best models, if you provide reasonable tools, with progressive discovery, and a semi-clear user request, the system prompt is essentially worthless.
4.
by RayVR 2mo ago
Yes, this is already accounted for in many benchmarks, but without deep context of the problem type, the top line pricing is the best starting point. In my own experience, Fable is more token efficient than opus 4.8 with a higher likelihood
5.
by RayVR 2mo ago
Non-competes in finance almost always come with compensation during the defined period. The idea that a company can restrict at-will employee’s post-separation employment is absurd if they aren’t compensating the individual. In many US stat
6.
by RayVR 3mo ago
I gave fable 5 a task for which opus has been really really underperforming. Fable 5 took far less time and produced actually useful analysis. Instead of just regurgitating roughly what the code already does or misunderstanding entirely, it
7.
by RayVR 4mo ago
I have been using opus 4.8 all morning and this is honestly the most sycophantic, ChatGPT like experience I have had from Anthropic. Very concerning.
8.
by RayVR 4mo ago
My own experience has been that it works for about five minutes before it just disconnects or hangs. I’ve never been able to use it successfully.
9.
by RayVR 5mo ago
My first experience with 5.5 via ChatGPT was immensely disappointing. It was a massive reduction in quality compared to 5.4, which already had issues.
10.
by RayVR 5mo ago
As with anything, it depends on the quality and skills of the people doing the designing. I have yet to really work with a designer that embedded themselves enough in the UX to design anything I thought was good. Granted, I have not worked
11.
by RayVR 6mo ago
Who cares? I used Claude code to build a custom notes application for my specific requirements. It’s not perfect, but I barely invested 10 hours in it and it does almost everything I could have asked for, plus some really cool stuff that mo
12.
by RayVR 6mo ago
These bear related sayings always make me laugh. The one I was told by a Russian: “don’t argue over how to skin the bear before you’ve killed it”
13.
by RayVR 6mo ago
That’s hilarious
14.
by RayVR 7mo ago
This is powerful. You’re finally saying the quiet part out loud. /s
15.
by RayVR 7mo ago
Did you read the article? Author is talking about humans relying on chatbots to formulate all their responses for them without strict direction and refinement.
16.
by RayVR 8mo ago
I'm sorry, but the music on the demo video is the most atrocious nonsense. I know it's crazy, but it makes me hate the app. openAI is falling off hard.
17.
by RayVR 8mo ago
I have often found proton’s intrusive marketing campaigns annoying. I use them for email and that’s all I want. Every time they market some new product to me, I get closer to moving to a new provider.
18.
by RayVR 8mo ago
Every time I open threads it’s mostly ChatGPT garbage from wannabe tech or finance influencers.
19.
by RayVR 8mo ago
I think the key thing here is in point 2. I’ve wanted a good markdown editor with automatic synchronization. I used to used inkdrop. Which I stopped using when the developer/owner raised the price to $120/year. In a couple hours w
20.
by RayVR 8mo ago
Why should anthropic open source Claude Code CLI? I understand you and some others want it, maybe it would be better for the community, but is it what’s best for anthropic? Why should subscribers get your specific discount rather than what
21.
by RayVR 9mo ago
I saw that rootmy.tv works for some versions of webos.
22.
by RayVR 9mo ago
I'm not arguing that human brains are magic. the current AI models will probably teach us more about what we didn't know about intelligence than anything else.
23.
by RayVR 9mo ago
Are you a stream of words or are your words the “simplistic” projection of your abstract thoughts? I don’t at all discount the importance of language in so many things, but the question that matters is whether statistical models of language
24.
by RayVR 11mo ago
I feel terrible for anyone relying on anything you produce as a proompt engineer
25.
by RayVR 11mo ago
This author obviously has no experience with investment banks. OpenAI is massive, fairly risky, associated with Microsoft, etc. all true. What matters to JPM is potential future business. There’s potentially an enormous IPO in the future. T
26.
by RayVR 11mo ago
Interesting. Not my experience at all. It makes mistakes that GPT-4 used to make: mixing languages (using Python syntax in C++ when I never asked any Python questions), imagining API calls that don’t exist in Google’s own products, writing
27.
by RayVR 1y ago
A faster model that outperforms its slower version on multiple benchmarks? Can anyone explain why that makes sense? Are they simply retraining on the benchmark tests?
28.
by RayVR 1y ago
I am a vim user. I map caps lock to super for a dead simple app shortcut system. I prefer being able to switch applications perfectly over a more convenient escape key. macOS app switching is broken by default.
29.
by RayVR 1y ago
You’re just wrong. There are multiple pieces to learning languages. I had immense success with wanikani, improving my listening and reading. Speaking can only be improved by speaking. No amount of language intake will improve output.
30.
by RayVR 1y ago
As an American, using it for technical projects, I find it extremely annoying. The only tactic I’ve found that helps is telling it to be highly critical. I still get overly positive starts but the response is more useful.

More ›