Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rastonbury
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Rastonbury
17d ago
Apart from those throw your CV into AI get guidance on how to make it more relevant to the roles you apply for, tailoring CVs is now table stakes when everyone does it. You don't agree blindly or copy verbatim with the AI but just as c
2.
▲
by
Rastonbury
3mo ago
I think they are referring to the opportunity cost of time saved on doing things a local model cannot do or fixing it's mistakes against the cost of a subscription
3.
▲
by
Rastonbury
3mo ago
Try this if you have access to Claude Design, go to sites you like, grab the html/css and a few screenshot and ask it to build a project, it makes an almost 1:1 reproduction. place those files into ur frontend project
4.
▲
by
Rastonbury
3mo ago
Really damn, 4.6 was my go to for some topics and more straight forward coding stuff. Fable was unable to keep track of chronology during 10-15 turn creative writing. compare to coding I reckon less than 100k token context, super surprising
5.
▲
by
Rastonbury
3mo ago
it took up 12gb on mine
6.
▲
by
Rastonbury
3mo ago
not much point if u live to 90 but your muscles have atrophyed and u can barely move about
7.
▲
by
Rastonbury
5mo ago
What is your use case? I read comments like this and it's totally opposite of my experience, I have both CC Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.4 and Codex is much more thorough and checks before it starts making changes maybe even to a fault but I a
8.
▲
by
Rastonbury
5mo ago
That's the thing, when that level comes we will never know it's here. The only thing we'll have as evidence is the company who has it will always have a "public" model that is just slightly ahead of all competitors
9.
▲
by
Rastonbury
5mo ago
Based on reading only I think a usable but a step below probably somewhat behind Sonnet. I also did read that some people successfully requested refunds late last year when their models shit the bed due to bugs so if they cut limits hard ma
10.
▲
by
Rastonbury
5mo ago
So Anthropic bundled CC with Claude.ai cuz OAI bundled chatgpt with Codex, now OAI is unbundling, IPO must be around the corner. Writing is also on the wall for CC usage based subscriptions now that main competitor effectively got rid of it
11.
▲
by
Rastonbury
5mo ago
On the surface it seems like it would be a good idea for all these users who were suspended to do a mass arbitration like what happened to Uber to get them to start taking it seriously, this comes up like monthly people getting account pull
12.
▲
by
Rastonbury
6mo ago
I thought npm started requiring hardware keys for publish, or may have been new accounts only
13.
▲
by
Rastonbury
6mo ago
it's ok it took me a few tried to realise I had the option to click instead of just wasd
14.
▲
by
Rastonbury
6mo ago
Dogs are just pattern matching based on their training set which is evolution /s
15.
▲
by
Rastonbury
6mo ago
Assistance of other humans? You do realise we're talking about an intelligence test right, at that point what are you even testing for. I'm sure you've taken exams where you couldn't bring your own notes, use Google or g
16.
▲
by
Rastonbury
6mo ago
Why must models be analogous to humans using tools? Or to take the analogy route further wouldn't it be better if humans had calculators built into their brains, provided they are determisitic and reduce latency
17.
▲
by
Rastonbury
7mo ago
I get the feeling that the founders will not bend and invest for long term and not quarterly, as a non ex-stripe at least judging by their patience to IPO
18.
▲
by
Rastonbury
7mo ago
Anyone who's seen an enterprise deal close or dealt with enterprise customer requests will know this, the build vs buy calculus has always been there yet companies still buy. Until you can get AI to the point where it equivalent to a 2
19.
▲
by
Rastonbury
7mo ago
I recently browsed r/chatgptcomplaints expecting to see You're absolutely right type memes and similar but it was all farewell posts to o4 and people showing each other how to set up o4 using the API
20.
▲
by
Rastonbury
7mo ago
Same person who wrote SCP Antimemetics Division which is great too
21.
▲
by
Rastonbury
7mo ago
That comment throws all econ 101 in the wrong way. A land owners decision to build a golf course over solar farm is a decision based on competing land uses which are demand/supply for land and the potential services you could provide o
22.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
negative benchmark isn't it? no sane lab is going to realease PR that states our newest model is best at lying, if anything the reverse may occur, if this catches on, they will make their model play werewolf badly and claim "align
23.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
I'm reminded of how blacksmiths use instant coffee to stain damascus steel, at least the ones on YouTube
24.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
would be interesting to see what scores it's get when it is actually degraded via the status page, it gets degraded pretty often, so there's at least something to compare or to know at what point Anthropic declares degradation
25.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
I'm not sure what the point is wrt ASML, they made good bets, they won their monopoly, their shareholders who funded the bets get to enjoy monopoly pricing. If they start cutting R&D and lose their crown, yes it's shame I gues
26.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
This was quick, it was never about the money, who needs Truth Social and Twitter when you have tiktok. Best of luck America
27.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
Destroying unit economics is a bit dramatic... you can chose thinking effort for modern models/APIs and add guidance to the system prompts
28.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
Judging by their status page riddled with red and orange as well as the months long degradation with blog post last Sept, it is not very reliable. If I sense it's responses are crap, I check the status page and low and behold usually i
29.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
If you truly don't want to research use rtings best monitor for X articles and find your budget and buy that one, if you feel the need to compare further pop the model numbers into your favourite LLM
30.
▲
by
Rastonbury
8mo ago
You don't need any of that per se, only if you want to sell enterprise or need to make investors happy, you do. But at $99/mo, people can put that on company card easily. Author only needs 10s of customers to make it worth their t
More ›