Probuin

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Probuin 1y ago

   That's exactly my point though. It is . From the article: >in September, legislators passed an amendment that made possessing and viewing deepfake porn punishable by up to three years in prison. This is insane.
2. 2.▲
   by Probuin 1y ago

   What gives you the right to claim that or police that, though? May I decree that women do not need social media to have love or happiness so it's ok to ban it, under threat of imprisonment if they access it? Is anything arbitrarily ope
3. 3.▲
   by Probuin 1y ago

   How is it not misandry? A law targeting men to deny them even the illusion of love and happiness, punishable by years in prison. A peaceful, albeit distasteful, fleeting solution to their complete rejection by society. I don't see why
4. 4.▲
   by Probuin 1y ago

   I understand the laws against distribution, but can anyone explain why creating/possessing deep-faked porn for private use is so morally reprehensible or even criminal? I can't identify a victim in this scenario. Whose business is
5. 5.▲
   by Probuin 1y ago

   Misandry is rampant too, which is a big part of why men are checking out or even developing resentment towards women. This article even touches on it, for example, in that just possessing deep-faked porn is punishable by up to 3 years impri