Polecat

5 ms·

1.
by Polecat 11y ago
>People form stronger bonds with animals that aren't edible. True, but not with animals they have only seen picture of. >On top of that, lions are regarded as noble animals, and this particular lion was killed in a dishonorable w
2.
by Polecat 11y ago
> killing it for no other reason than for some kind of misguided personal glory. So would the issue then cover hunting as well, would there still have been an outcry if he did it legally?
3.
by Polecat 11y ago
Fair enough, but i don't think the large amount of people who got outraged about this do care.
4.
by Polecat 11y ago
I just wonder why people care about this one specific lion. Cause it had a nickname and was "famous"? No one cares about animals being killed on mass so we can eat them, i know i don't, but oh no, a lion is killed, they are r
5.
by Polecat 11y ago
Agreed, that's the part i'm interested in the most
6.
by Polecat 11y ago
Sounds like your philosophy is being a bit of a dick
7.
by Polecat 11y ago
Science is my rifle. Intellect is my blade.
8.
by Polecat 11y ago
If we can somehow eliminate input lag.
9.
by Polecat 11y ago
Didn't the big tech companies make an agreement to not poach employees from each other?
10.
by Polecat 11y ago
Or anything "killer" in general. As evident by every MMORPG that is coming out being the "World of Warcraft killer" an then disappearing into obscurity after a few months of hype while WoW keeps on going.
11.
by Polecat 11y ago
Depression is a disorder, it's not people who just felt a bit sad and then killed themselves because they didn't have their priorities strait.
12.
by Polecat 11y ago
I remember hearing that a similar technique is used to spot infringement in dictionaries. Pretty clever.
13.
by Polecat 11y ago
How do you know they are fabricated?
14.
by Polecat 11y ago
Great point. But I really enjoyed reading the article for some reason, maybe it's just the style.
15.
by Polecat 11y ago
Restart their router :^)