Pinn2

5 ms·

1.
by Pinn2 12y ago
I have a huge ego and like more money. Is HackerOne the best way to feed both?
2.
by Pinn2 12y ago
The .gitignore is a good way to see if a project cares about being precise.
3.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Except for you, right? People like to feel better about themselves by declaring defects in everyone else but themselves. Even me.
4.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Liking the Go, not liking the .gitignore.
5.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Spark any use? I just saw free and assumed some ptw scheme.
6.
by Pinn2 12y ago
As usual, I checked the .gitignore. You may want to try "/gowiki" instead of "gowiki".
7.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Limited still means having a choice in what to bet. Trivial EV calculations can only tell you to bet or not, so I assume it's using something more involved.
8.
by Pinn2 12y ago
I texted to a word game displayed on a Times Square banner. Got monthly "support emails" featuring garbage trivia, and a $10 charge hidden on my at&T bill. I think it was one of those shortened phone numbers, though.
9.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Quite the opposite of "lacking"--way too much.
10.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Well, that's a knock on /github then. The entries should be as minimal as possible, in number and in individual length.
11.
by Pinn2 12y ago
I find the .gitignore a good way to gauge the quality of a repo. This one does not exhibit quality.
12.
by Pinn2 12y ago
.gitignore ignores "foo" and "bar". Should I trust the rest of the project? Is this a convention?
13.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Neat! Just remember that it's not just who you know--it's what you know! You'll go far.
14.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Neat! Would a 1-bit computer be 8 times easier?
15.
by Pinn2 12y ago
Are there any ads? It is unusual for a game to be on the App Store without monetization.
16.
by Pinn2 12y ago
I have more trust in Apple Pay and hope that wins.
17.
by Pinn2 12y ago
At some point we'll have unified memory and storage anyway. Our brains are already unified in our perception of memory, so I have no problem telling people the storage amount as "memory".
18.
by Pinn2 12y ago
The problem with Markov chains is that they are named after a person, which makes math seem more like a "private club". For instance, why use "abelian group", when "commutative group" will do? The reasons for