PeterZaitsev

7 ms·

1.
by PeterZaitsev 7mo ago
The problem goes as well - there is a fair amount of users who are happy to pay for OSS software, yet a lot of VC funded companies in the chase of growth invest much more than Open Source ecosystem is willing to fund... the usual result is
2.
by PeterZaitsev 7mo ago
Hehe. "All Benchmarks" he says...
3.
by PeterZaitsev 10mo ago
Is it like free does of heroin so you get addicted and later pay dearly ? :) In the fair world freesql.com would have hosted PostgreSQL
4.
by PeterZaitsev 10mo ago
Note, if you're looking for MongoDB Enterprise features you can find many of them with Percona Server for MongoDB, which you can use for free the same way as MongoDB Community
5.
by PeterZaitsev 11mo ago
I see the license is AGPLv3 while current MongoDB versions as SSPL - does it means you took the MongoDB Parser circa 2018 as a base ?
6.
by PeterZaitsev 11mo ago
There is no one size fits all. On the small scale "managed" cloud which takes care of as many things as possible is effective. As you scale though it will cost proportional to environment size, except some discount. With solution
7.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
You can also consider https://coroot.com - it supports integration both with Collector and without as well as simulated eBPF traces for applications which are not Otel enabled.
8.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Should not we look for database to be able to do online, efficient non locking addition of column with any default value, not just NULL rather than application to have a complicated and fragile logic ?
9.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Is there GitHub link or something ? Right now as I follow the link all it wants is for me to "login" before showing anything at all
10.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Love hearing Open Source and SelfHosted but I do not clearly see link to the Github or other place where source code is. There is no link to the code in the launch message either.
11.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
One one side creators are welcome to choose whom to offer their software, on the other I wonder how it will stand in regard to "anti discrimination" in various countries. In any case, just please do not call this Open Source :)
12.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
What differences from original mission do you see ?
13.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
This looks awesome! What can be challenge with such solutions is getting the last 1% right when it comes to sharding tricky queries properly (or at least detecting queries which are not handled properly) and also isolation and consistency
14.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Yep. This "little addition" to the license will likely make it non Open Source according to standard definition. It reminds me "Commons Clause" which Redis tried to add to its license years ago... and later pulled back.
15.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
I think comparing it to Vector Database is confusing as database would typically mean indexes and some sort of query support. Storing Embeddings with File is interesting concept... we already do it for some file formats (ie EXIF), where thi
16.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
If you USE Redis, you do not have to if you Embed Redis you do. Same with GPL
17.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Yep. Actually if Redis would end up in CNCF and Redis Labs could provide commercial hosting, extensions - this would be outcome I would be excited about
18.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Note AGPL license is in completely different class compared to BSD. Where BSD was level playing field allowing anyone to do commercial derivatives, now only Redis can do it. I also question whenever this decision comes from the pure change
19.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Looked at the repo. License of mix of Apache 2.0 and BSL is rather unclear.
20.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
I'm not sure whole "Observability 2.0" focuses on the most pressing problem, which is complexity, both in deployment and usage. At Coroot we focus not on the format of the data and whenever it should be one thing or several
21.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Not including original license may well be oversight, It is very unlikely Microsoft would intentionally to do something like this, which costs them really nothing, but not doing it can post a lot in the future in the legal costs. For the re
22.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
How are you using this data right now ? If you plan to use Coroot for visualization why not to convert it to more efficient format Coroot uses ?
23.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
I wonder if anyone tried to integrate Odigos with Coroot - looks like it could be really powerful!
24.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
I wonder when we can get LLM, which might be more "stupid" but knows what it does not know rather than hallucinates... Though perhaps when it would be not LLM but entirely different tech :)
25.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
VC = Growth fast or Die with Die being much more likely. Sustainable growth is not part of outcomes pursued.
26.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Yeah. It is surprising this announcement does not come with link to Github. Hopefully they can follow through - the challenge in such situation might be relying on some proprietary technology for your SaaS which you can't open source.
27.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Yes. The keyword is "Proprietary" whenever it is offered by large company or small, Open Source solution you can chose to migrate to is what really offers you safety. This also tends to ensure multiple DBaaS vendors are availa
28.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
Yes. We will work with you to help you, does not mean it is not going to be disruptive. Changing database technology is hard. Moving off from cloud to self serviced option is also hard.
29.
by PeterZaitsev 1y ago
This highlights the challenge of smaller proprietary SaaS offerings - they can shut down abruptly leaving you in the bind. It is great to see Fauna making a commitment to Open Source the project, which will be great option to have for their
30.
by PeterZaitsev 2y ago
Looks cool! If you're looking for this kind of UI also check out Coroot https://github.com/coroot/coroot which has awesome UI for logs and OpenTelemetry traces and also stores data in Clickhouse

More ›