Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Person5478
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
IIRC, they were doing things like patching bittorrent to prefer closer IP's to pull from during their deploys. So it would roll through their network from 1 side to the other without just completely saturating the entire network. But
2.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I want both. I would be completely happy if IOS by default did not allow all the things it doesn't allow, but you could add a setting to allow 3rd party app stores with a list that apple curated themselves (similar to search engine pre
3.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Because it's both unnecessary and distracting. When I misunderstand titles and then realize my mistake I don't start complaining about it. Can it be read either way? Yes. Does it really matter? No. Language is often ambiguous
4.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
> Someone can believe in free speech while choosing to censor their own platform No, someone can __CLAIM__ to believe in free speech, but if they're not allowing it on their own platform then they really don't. There's a
5.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
The posters point is that Ruby has surprising concurrency semantics compared to other solutions.
6.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
yeah, Heroku infamously had a really hard time getting Ruby to scale well. Ruby traded safety (GIL) for absolutely speed, although it should be noted that Ruby's C interfaces do allow you to op out of the GIL, which means if speed is a
7.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Same for me only it was mid to late 90's and I was interested in understanding MUD code. I have fond memories of that guide and it's always a treat when it pops back up.
8.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
lots of people were using lots of things at that time, most were using git.
9.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
git was the clear winner when github released.
10.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
That is absolutely hilarious.
11.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
it's not an analogy.
12.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
> I'd say about 90% or so of the code I look at where someone is building raw SQL queries has trivial SQL injections in it. Just parameterize the query and you're done. If someone isn't doing so in 2020 they're eithe
13.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Not only that, but in order to build a fault tolerant system you __WANT__ your components to fail fast and hard. Anything else runs the risk of your system doing the wrong thing while you have no idea it's happening. failing is noisy,
14.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
> and will often leave or mistrust you otherwise Oh bullcrap. This is just a rationalization from people who like the shiny.
15.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
This is an area where the law needs to catch up. Current law limits what many people can do in terms of the stock market specifically to protect unsavvy investors. What Robinhood is doing is no different than a 3rd party acting as a go bet
16.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Under your definition the word cripple would also be a slur. When we get to that point, we've lost the forest for the trees.
17.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I don't know your age, but I suspect it's more likely you're finally reaching the point of realizing how shit everyone and everything is. My experience was stupidly believing the idealistic crap I was taught when young only t
18.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I think the idea is that a slur is a much stronger insult typically aimed at one's ethnicity. What's being said here is that the word retard is an insult, but does not rise to the level/strength of a slur.
19.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I would legit watch a Star Trek franchise that had the Ferengi running Big Tech.
20.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I know HN doesn't like these types of comments, but I genuinely laughed.
21.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Hard agree for businesses. Office just isn't that expensive anymore, especially if you're in the MS ecosystem already.
22.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
This is known as common law marriage and has the requirement that you _PRESENT_ as married to the world. If you don't present as married you are not common law married.
23.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
yes. every woman I've ever dated has understood from the beginning that if she ends up pregnant there will paternity tests done. I've had a few get angry with me, but all of them understood it was going to happen regardless of the
24.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
I graduated HS in the late 90's, have no children, and it was a very explicit choice. When I was in college I read a story about a boy who was raped and then the courts required him to pay child support (IIRC the woman was a caregiver
25.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Maybe it's a cultural thing but I've never seen a company require a leetcode score and I don't think I would ever apply to such a company. It seems weird to me.
26.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Anyone who thinks not all "security vulnerabilities" are created equal believes security is just not important.
27.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
threat of harm is protected speech. It has to be shown that there is both intent and the ability to carry it out before it starts entering the territory of illegal. Which makes sense if you think about it. A 5 year old child threatening yo
28.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
Just break them up, this type of legislation is going to harm everyone.
29.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
seriously, this is a common problem online for some reason. Why do so many people try to act as if implication isn't a thing in online interactions?
30.
▲
by
Person5478
6y ago
exactly. The platform used to be the OS, but google effectively commoditized it and the new platform is the 'cloud'. If you're on MS your new platform is going to be OWS, Azure, etc. With google it's going to be google
More ›