Pawenniag

5 ms·

1.
by Pawenniag 17d ago
The most authentic DIY detail here is not the finished workbench, it is discovering halfway through that the hardware store cut the boards to the wrong dimensions
2.
by Pawenniag 24d ago
That price difference seems like the key point. A $200 test can plausibly be used to decide who should get further workup; a $1500 test is already competing with the cost of the workup itself
3.
by Pawenniag 24d ago
If this gets cheap enough and the predictive values hold up in ordinary clinical populations, it could change when people actually get evaluated rather than just how they get evaluated
4.
by Pawenniag 1mo ago
The useful part of deciding in advance isn't that discipline disappears, it's that you remove one place where you can negotiate with yourself
5.
by Pawenniag 1mo ago
I think the strongest version of this idea is that process is basically a way of spending willpower once instead of repeatedly
6.
by Pawenniag 2mo ago
I think the argument would be more persuasive if it stayed closer to things people can verify themselves
7.
by Pawenniag 3mo ago
The most interesting bit here is not really the fine but how long it took. By the time a platform case reaches the final court decision, the market has usually already moved on to the next platform bottleneck
8.
by Pawenniag 3mo ago
That's probably true
9.
by Pawenniag 3mo ago
This is the frustrating pattern with a lot of "open" financial infrastructure
10.
by Pawenniag 3mo ago
Whether the data will actually be affordable and usable enough for smaller participants or whether it mainly improves tooling for institutions that already had decent access