PatrickAuld

7 ms·

1.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
> “We will continue to fight to protect our members’ ability to control the information they make available on LinkedIn.” LinkedIn has full control over this, it's their site. What they are fighting for is the ability to choose who
2.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
The GCE Over Quota page is perfect.
3.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
I think they just didn't think I was a fit, which I take as a complement. I could have played the part better but I went through the interview like any other and actually said at some point that "I don't like disruption was a
4.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
Having sat through it (but not having experience in law) I don't believe it would. I'm sure the interviewer and the rest of Uber would say they didn't break the law; only that they enabled and took maybe encouraged others to.
5.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
All they asked me for was a similar experience, not if I had broken the law. The example and question were based on their Core Value of 'Persistent Confrontation' which basically was spun to mean 'don't stop if you know
6.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
Culture comes from the top and Uber's is pretty rotten. I did an interview there this year and it was the most aggressive questioning I've ever had. Two of 5 interviewers were really in my face while architecting systems; it was b
7.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
You can calculate lots of interesting things about a face based on this. Including generating a face that people will remember very well because of unique features or one that is hard to recognize. The optimizations our minds have found for
8.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
It's important to remember what you are trying to do when you are being accommodating. You want to help others help themselves so that they are more capable in the end. The author here took 100% of the work and pains from those around
9.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
If you put "It was/is obvious" in a patent application, regardless if it involves hyperspace or not, the USPO should reject it outright.
10.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
Definitely possible, Apple uses vendors in a way that would be difficult to do themselves. However, if I'm right about the types of jobs this will create it does fall in line with Apple's expertise more than a human built process.
11.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
I think "Advanced Manufacturing Jobs" are going to be roboticist, machine learning and mechanical engineer related. Foxconn is moving this direction and I'm betting Apple thinks they can do it as well as them. Plus possible t
12.
by PatrickAuld 9y ago
We also did a POC with PhantomJS and found similar issues, as well as generally flakiness causing too many false negatives. Ended up not using it; I'm hoping this can simplify things are give something more solid to build on.