PPLwynSPFJ5p

7 ms·

1.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
I don't think Newton thought of it that way.
2.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
If the earth were as old as lots of people seem to believe, there would be adequate evidence for macroevolution in the fossil record which COULD then be observed. But the fact remains that all of the predicted transitional fossils are notab
3.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
Well said, HillObeans. I would like to ask permission to quote you in my forthcoming book, Darwin's Knickers (or maybe I'll call it, Knickers to Darwin - I haven't really decided yet [see one of my earlier posts on this delib
4.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
I sympathize with your problem. But the problem is, you have confused creationists with theistic evolutionists! They are the ones that say that evolution occurred, but God guided it. He didn't. He created EX NIHILO, from scratch, in th
5.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
Ah, a Humanist, that explains a lot. Woodlice first appear in the fossil record 50 million years ago, and remain unchanged to this day, i.e STASIS, not evolution (as in every other case in the fossil record). If you have a picture of a wood
6.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
And what exactly has evolution got to do with Science and Engineering? Name one advance in your own field that has been made by an evolutionist? And why do you find the teaching of creationism in a scientific context abhorrent? I think you
7.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
I suppose you would advocate the teaching in schools of man-made global warming as well, despite the fact that it has been adequately exposed over and over again as a complete and utter fraud, with data fiddled by mainstream 'scientist
8.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
Just one of the scientific discoveries pointing to a young earth (which you describe as being 'bogus', and without evidence) was found recently by Dr. Mary Schweitzer, an evolutionist, not a creationist, and can be found here alon
9.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
Glad to see that some of them are taking their religious convictions (as well as their science) seriously, and are not bowing down to the sacred cow of Darwinism. The students you refer to don't know how lucky they are to have such pri
10.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
The reason why wives are to submit themselves to their husbands is because the Bible actually SAYS SO - or didn't you read the Bible when you were at Catholic school? (It stems from the fact that Adam was created first, and Eve second
11.
by PPLwynSPFJ5p 12y ago
Perhaps the Catholic Church would like to enlighten us evolutionary skeptics as to precisely what scientific discoveries "in later years have substantially strengthened the theory"? Evolutionist are abandoning Darwinian theory in