Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
OpieCunningham
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
2y ago
I saw it in mid April. Walked right in at the scheduled time. But I did feel that was anomalous. Both d’Orsay and Louvre should really be capping daily entrants - it’s becoming a significant waste to go when you’re 5-10 meters away with a c
2.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
3y ago
The US accepted 22,645 refugees in 2022. Since 1990 the U.S. has accepted, on average, roughly 75,000 per year. In 2021, the US accepted 11,411 refugees (approx. 1 refugee per 28,900 citizens), and Finland accepted 1,282 refugees (approx. 1
3.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
4y ago
Am I supposed to be more concerned with leave no trace than I am with people slipping through the cracks of society? Because I’m not.
4.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
4y ago
Le Corbusier, a pioneer of YIMBYism. To be fair, housing costs in Paris would be much more reasonable, both due to such a glut of housing and the subsequent decreased interest in living there.
5.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
“They say the smog is the reason we have such beautiful sunsets.”
6.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Nice. > I don't think it's an emergent property, I think it's a by-product of the constraints. > Imagine if you were trying to fix climate change, but under the condition that you weren't allowed to burn fewer foss
7.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Life span is increasing very marginally. You are probably referring to life expectancy, which has been increasing. Life span is how old a human is capable of living. This number has not changed much in hundreds or thousands of years. Life e
8.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Bits ‘n Picas is pretty good. https://github.com/kreativekorp/bitsnpicas
9.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
“After the Equifax breach, everyone learned that until there are actual repercussions for cyber attacks (like fines and people going to jail for negligence), if you can weather the storm, over the course of a year or two, there is effective
10.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Put it this way: if you’re lucky and work hard, you could be like Messi. If you’re very very lucky and don’t work hard, you may still be like Messi. If you’re unlucky and work hard, you won’t ever be like Messi. Just ask Babe Ruth, he didn’
11.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
I just watched the scene in For All Mankind with the astronauts/lunar surface/duct tape and it seemed to match this article. Which aspects of For All Mankind are you referencing that got it wrong?
12.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Asked and answered.
13.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Ignoring context is a thing I guess. But can you imagine if being an asshole was a protected class? The world would be a terrible place if the loudest, most obnoxious people never faced consequences.
14.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Maybe their reputations weren’t all that impressive to begin with. In any case, “allowing” is doing some heavy lifting there. No one is allowing anything. This is just how a society with mostly free expression works. Are people not supposed
15.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Considering most cancelled subscriptions are cancelled within a trial period, the average subscription duration is heavily weighted down. Your point would be something worth considering if you had an average that excluded all cancellations
16.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
I’ve lived and driven in cities my entire life. If I was a police officer and saw any single event captured in that video I’d keep my eye on the vehicle. The vehicle in that video repeatedly followed up questionable activity with additional
17.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Any non-AV driver seen doing even 1/4 of what FSD did in that video would have been pulled over and fined. Regardless of their personal driving history. When FSD does cause an accident, the driver who enabled it can also be charged wit
18.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
5y ago
Until someone does, the people posting these videos, and anyone found to be driving with FSD enabled should be fined and have points applied to their license for reckless driving.
19.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
You mean Not Banksy the pretend street artist, or Not Not Banksy the pretend commercial street artist, or Mr. Brainwash?
20.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
Or a game of Chutes & Ladders, during lunch, in a forest
21.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
This 2038 bug won’t stay buried for long.
22.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
From that link: “A large retrospective cohort study found a significant association of mercury based fillings with the development of Parkinson's disease.” (Reference to 2000 - 2008 study in Taiwan.)
23.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
> The Wire is not about police, nor about drug gangs. It’s about the city of Baltimore. It definitely takes place in Baltimore, and is based upon experiences of David Simon while a newspaper reporter in Baltimore, but it definitely is ab
24.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
Everyone does it so I can too? You have to start somewhere. But yes, let’s also cut off all the others you mentioned.
25.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
How much time do I have?
26.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
>But 95% of everything is really people decrying textualism and actively choosing their ideology. Of course the textualist thinks only he is above ideology. This is how you can tell they're clowns.
27.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
Textualism outside of law is fun. Enjoy. In the context of law, and this entire thread, it's nonsense used by people to make themselves think they are smart, or trick other people into thinking they must be smart. In law, everything
28.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
The Supreme Court issues opinions. That's the actual word they use to describe what they write. You can either form an opinion or you can discover a truth. The Supreme Court does not discover whether it is true or not that a law is con
29.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
OK. My interpretation seems to be much closer to the words as written. I'd give myself credit for being a textualist, if I didn't think that label was just a scam. In any case, your read is that the court had an opinion about the
30.
▲
by
OpieCunningham
6y ago
Textualism is nothing more than interpreting something in a way that you believe doesn't align with some older thing you also interpreted in a way. "I believe this new law is incompatible with what I believe this old rule says.&qu
More ›