OPoncz

6 ms·

1.
by OPoncz 2y ago
It's not right to say that Redis "had nothing to do with its development." They were a major contributors and were managing the project for many years. The problem like many other open source project is that the innovation is
2.
by OPoncz 2y ago
https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly Is a multi-threaded drop in replacment
3.
by OPoncz 2y ago
Sure. You can do that. But the community needs a single standard. Open standard that all in-memory data stores like Redis, ValKey, DragonflyDB, KeyDB, Kvrocks will support. Otherwise you will end up in a vendor lock.
4.
by OPoncz 2y ago
Its available on Dragonfly https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly Here is the docs https://www.dragonflydb.io/docs/command-reference/hashes/hex...
5.
by OPoncz 2y ago
The figma route is exactly the case were the cost of service is very low. It make sense for Figma to offer a free tier because it costs them almost nothing. But when you have to keep the data available in submillisecond latency it is to exp
6.
by OPoncz 2y ago
We @Dragonfly had BSL right from start. I think it makes most sense for todays infrastructure echsystem.
7.
by OPoncz 3y ago
HA already supported since v1.0. Dragonfly is released under BSL1.1. Its free for use in most cases. https://www.dragonflydb.io/docs/about/faq
8.
by OPoncz 3y ago
All, My name is Oded Poncz, I am the CEO of DragonflyDB. Our goal with the FAQ was to aggragate valuable information for our community. We will take all the valuable feedback from this thread and improve. Thank you all for the feedback.
9.
by OPoncz 3y ago
KeyDB is a fork of Redis, whereas Dragonfly introduces a brand-new architecture, crafted from the ground up utilizing a share nothing, multi-threaded design. It implements both Redis and memcached APIs
10.
by OPoncz 3y ago
hmm, Redis Labs are setting a cluster of 40 Redis processes on the same instance. It would be extremely difficult to do that with Redis OSS for anyone else.
11.
by OPoncz 4y ago
The Change Date specifies when the source file changes from BSL to the specified Open Source license. Its always in the future.
12.
by OPoncz 4y ago
GPL is copyleft and more restrictive in some elements. BSL 1.1 is actually quite popular nowdays.
13.
by OPoncz 4y ago
License is standard BSL 1.1. which means you can use it in production for your own workloads as long as you do not provide DF as a managed service.
14.
by OPoncz 4y ago
Yes
15.
by OPoncz 4y ago
In Redis cluster the client needs to be connected to all shards and manage those connections. Multi-key operation on different slots are not supported etc... Maintaining a cluster is not a fun responsibility. DF saves you in most cases from
16.
by OPoncz 4y ago
Modern as the entire architecture is based on papers from the last few years. But also the first commit :)
17.
by OPoncz 4y ago
Actually snapshot is done in the background and does not use fork like Redis. You can see it here: https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly#memory-efficiency-b...
18.
by OPoncz 4y ago
I assume DF has the same performance as Memcached. It would be great if someone makes this benchmark and share.
19.
by OPoncz 4y ago
DF also has a noval eviction algorithm that combines LRU and LFU which could be great for caching use cases.