Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NotMyMorals
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>Gender roles are a problem because they mean that anyone who doesn't fit into them nicely gets screwed over. This affects, oooh, probably pretty much everyone because the odds of someone matching up with them exactly in every possible
2.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Why are gender roles a "problem?"
3.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
> Egalitarian marriages last longer. Do you have any data for that, or even a rigorous definition of an "egalitarian marriage?"
4.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>Is the pursuit of equality really something you think of as strange or outdated? Labeling your ideology with glittering generalities like the "pursuit of equality" doesn't change the substance. "Equality" was traditionally understood t
5.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>feminism is a social movement that only works when it is widely understood Feminism is widely understood. Feminists, like most cultural leftists, simply assume that anyone who rejects their ideology doesn't "understand it." Our underst
6.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>There are people fighting traditional gender roles. But then you get called a feminazi by people who don't want change. People who embrace our traditions get called "troglodytes" "fascists" "nazis" "sexists" and the like by cultural Ma
7.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>Changing yourself is easy; getting others to want to change themselves is not. Yes, and why should we want to change to be like you?
8.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>One way to cure this symptom of patriarchy is to try to stop being a 'troglodyte' as you put it. "Patriarchy?" Cultural Marxism went out in the 1970s. "Troglodyte?" As a metaphor for a man who works and takes care of his wife and child
9.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Cultural Marxism is "just" a "scary-sounding label?" Yet you seem to freely use the jargon without understanding it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism Perhaps you are simply ignorant of the origin of your "privilege" rhetoric.
10.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>"Reverse sexism"? Check your privilege. "Privilege?" Check your cultural Marxism.
11.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
The pejorative usage of "brogrammer" is more like "a programmer who displays all the worst characteristics normally associated with high school jocks" -- things like arrogance, misogyny, bullying, and unwarranted aggression Who associates
12.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
I looked up "brogrammer." "A popular, cool, or otherwise normal person who has become intrigued by the fun of programming. Usually unliked by the nerdy programmers for getting all of the friends and the girls, while creating cool and useful
13.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
This is actually something I think will go away once we manage to overcome sexism in society. There is really no reason for it at all. My subjective impression of you and your "anti-sexism" is that you are an ideological fanatic. Fortunat
14.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
I find it hard to believe that all females(or males) exhibit same behavioral and learning traits. I don't see anyone suggesting such a thing, but instead, that the majority of each gender may have certain behavior and learning styles in c
15.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
They should be separate but equal. The horror - they even have segregated bathrooms!
16.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
"I think for the sake of civilization, we should try to involve women as much as we can and aim for the 50-50." I think for the sake of civilization, we should not try to aim for a 50/50 ratio. Your utopia is another person's dystopia. Not
17.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Competent men do not 'show of their skills, brag and one-up other men'. Yes they most certainly do. Yes, they may be technically competent, but they are socially incompetent, because they never progressed beyond that juvenile behavior.
18.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Do you actually compare a desire to get more women into tech with forced castration?! Did you actually read that comment as comparing the "desire to get more women into tech" with castration? You really didn't understand that the castrati
19.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Or maybe women would respond to knowledgeable female jerks differently and perhaps more effectively than to knowledgeable male jerks?
20.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Wasn't the term "computer" at one time used to describe usually female mathematicians who worked in all female groups at DoD? Perhaps the problem isn't women, and it isn't men, but instead the urge to force them together and then demand the
21.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
Which is probably why pwpwp didn't specifically refer to the self-selected women in the class, but made a general point about the industry and the ridiculous attempts to impose a completely artificial 50/50 gender ratio. The comic could hav
22.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
I wonder if it would have been as effective without the male villain. The trope reinforces the moral, but it kind of beats us over the head with it. The author clearly stated he felt challenged by the display of dominance by another male,
23.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
these questions seemed designed to show off his own knowledge, or to challenge the instructor. Yes, Dave was showing off to an audience of women. she asked me a question she giggled and told me she had no idea what the project was about,
24.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
In the above, "intellectual workers" would probably translate better as "political workers" as far as its use in cultural Marxist writings.
25.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
I don't know about him, but "sexism" is not a problem at all in the real world. "Sexism" is a concept invented by cultural Marxists who openly proposed its use to disrupt existing cultural groups for the benefit of certain social classes (i
26.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>We strive for a balance because that's a good way to avoid excluding people. Excluding groups of people is bad because they may have different ways to attack problems or different insights to bring to development etc. We exclude all so
27.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>And is that really an awful way for guys to hit on you? They're going to do that anyway, and at least this way they're expressing interest in your interests, rather than just staring at your chest. If the man is attractive, women will
28.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>You obviously are a jerk. And you are obviously a "nice guy."
29.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
I agree with you - you will never find me, as a man, "fighting for women's rights." My t-shirt says "This is What a Feminist Looks At."
30.
▲
by
NotMyMorals
14y ago
>Also men and women are very similar in terms of values and attitudes towards sex regardless of the prevailing popular myths. In the sense they both expect different values and attitudes towards sex from men and women. Keep your religio
More ›