NolF

7 ms·

1.
by NolF 17d ago
It is already the case in many Australian Courts and tribunals E.g. NSW Supremen Court [1] here is another tribunal [2]. Not sure why you would not like the disclosure as to how a document, statement, etc was made when the author was not th
2.
by NolF 23d ago
There probably also won't be enough people to pay $30 per year to justify the salary of the people to maintain it. Microsoft tried that with Windows 10 and largely gave up outside of Corporations which they had by the gonads.
3.
by NolF 2mo ago
That just seemed to be standard venting, methane if I'm not mistaken.
4.
by NolF 2y ago
The group exploited a bug in WhatsApp to deliver the spyware. It wasn't an E2E issue. > A U.S. judge ruled on Friday in favor of Meta Platforms' (META.O), opens new tab WhatsApp in a lawsuit accusing Israel's NSO Group of
5.
by NolF 2y ago
There is certainly an economic utility to a more educated populous, but should that cost 30k+ in debt? If the ROI isn't there and the purpose is a general one for the economic benefit of the nation, shouldn't the taxpayer bear the
6.
by NolF 3y ago
My understanding was that ads pay to be viewed, they can't get paid if you have it on background play and not watching. So they made it a premium feature and get paid by the subscription.
7.
by NolF 3y ago
The Courts already have mechanisms to limit "unlimited" subpoenas or requests for discovery. Requests for the software source code or similar, bug reports, and other reports of issues are or would largely not be unreasonable where
8.
by NolF 3y ago
Because there isn't much difference in the force between a 1m and a 8000m drop due to the above. So it really comes down to case, angle, and material onto which it was dropped with corners being more vulnerable.
9.
by NolF 3y ago
I believe the issue with Lovelace is that you may find less than PG results typing that on a search engine. Hence using Ada primarily on the marketing. I think the complaint is more with the consumer card being 4xxx but this is 5000 both o
10.
by NolF 3y ago
The question would be, do you want to fight Disney lawyers to make the argument that your use was not as a trademark, represented as Disney, or that it might cause confusion? With or without a disclaimer.
11.
by NolF 3y ago
It's probably too short. It would live authors with very little bargaining power particularly if they become bigger in their writing carriers. Corporations would just have to wait 20 years and save themselves the exclusive rights and r
12.
by NolF 3y ago
That's why they get you to agree to new terms and conditions with an update, or when there is a new TC you get a lovely email or whatever to ignore. Either you don't accept it so you don't get the update or you don't acc
13.
by NolF 3y ago
Most licence terms already include a term to change the terms. So technically once you buy it, install it, and agree to it, you are also agreeing the terms may change. They probably also have arbitration clauses you are agreeing to so you c
14.
by NolF 3y ago
Nah, because there was a failure with the policy implementation the kid got a proper name and no record that it had changed.
15.
by NolF 3y ago
What's the case law that social meedia sites are responsible for the content on their site? Youtube just recently won the ISIS recruitment case as a counter example [0]. [0] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22
16.
by NolF 3y ago
Yes and no, I think. If you have a valid exemption under copyright (e.g. fair use) then you don't need a licence for the use or making of the derivative work. Obviously such a defence (e.g. fair use) would likely be very difficult in t
17.
by NolF 3y ago
Company: we have "connectedness" issues with remote work Everyone: what have you tried? Company: Nothing, it didn't work, and we are out of ideas. Back to the office. Genuinely, all these companies raising issues with trainin
18.
by NolF 3y ago
He created the idea at the beginning of the pandemic. His thought process was that the Mr Beast brand would allow smaller stores to carry his product and incentivise people to buy take out from those shops and help during lockdowns. I don&#
19.
by NolF 3y ago
Yes. Trademark law says the use of a trademark as a trademark is an issue. Using the discord logo to link to a discord channel is fine. Allowing a site to be named Discord with a different TLD is using a trademark as a trademark and that ca
20.
by NolF 3y ago
There is apparently a whole bunch of controversy with the paper being published by one of the authors that had been allegedly kicked out and wanted to ensure he was credited as an author. The other authors were apparently still working on t
21.
by NolF 3y ago
It would likely fall under "unconscionable conduct" which is illegal under the ACL. I would imagine it would difficult for them to prevent individual licences being sold through their retail/online mechanisms.. You would have
22.
by NolF 3y ago
Some of the protections do apply to business purchases such as section 18 of the ACL which relates to misleading and deceptive conduct and section 29 regarding false or misleading representations. Businesses, will, in some scenarios (they n
23.
by NolF 3y ago
For Australians, if you are affected, this is the kind of issue that should be raised with ACCC at https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/report-a-consume... . It falls under the Australian Consumer Protection
24.
by NolF 3y ago
Such as "No hate speech".
25.
by NolF 3y ago
> This metaphor doesn't map cleanly to when rules are less specific or laid out - because in this situation, the rules have been well tested and made to be unambiguous! I disagree, lawyers would have no work then. Laws are not as sp
26.
by NolF 3y ago
My employer uses the MS Auth app. Now when logging in, it shows a number on the screen that you have to type on the app and then use the finger print. Before it used to be the fingerprint only. Seems like a relatively effective way to ensur
27.
by NolF 3y ago
Considering there is a "calibration" step. I'm going to guess that as long as the "bad" eye behaves relatively predictably, it should be able to ignore the bad input and put appropriate weight on the "good&quot
28.
by NolF 3y ago
Yes and no. Court decisions do generally follow a structure, but the decisions and the reasons for a final determination, may not always be clear. Judges also may throw in hypotheticals which whilst informative are not determinative. Once i
29.
by NolF 4y ago
You jest but I got the following response with the GPT-4 model > Two pounds of feathers are heavier than a pound of bricks. The weight of the feathers is twice as much as the bricks, even though they may take up more space and seem light
30.
by NolF 4y ago
The article says you should reserve 17% of your project budget in training. Couldn't good UX help with that?

More ›