NoOn3

5 ms·

1.
by NoOn3 1mo ago
I seriously belive that it was possible to vote away Stalin. But I'm Russian maybe I'm mistaken, but I think the accusations against Stalin are exaggerated. He was not clearly only terrible. There were definitely difficult times,
2.
by NoOn3 1mo ago
These are not just staged photos for propaganda; they are ordinary, everyday life captured in photographs. Life in the USSR was not that bad as it is written here in the comments. Education was free and quite good. Medicine was free. In goo
3.
by NoOn3 1mo ago
It's not that obvious.
4.
by NoOn3 3mo ago
Because he sponsored those who already have something really valuable, and not just anyone.
5.
by NoOn3 3mo ago
Most likely that this works in a small number of all cases.
6.
by NoOn3 3mo ago
An obvious calculation. The real world cannot be calculated so easily, It is changing unexpectedly and quickly.
7.
by NoOn3 3mo ago
People often say that things only get better and cheaper with tech progress, but it doesn't always seem so straightforward to me. Does the average(median) citizen own more land, houses, or cars/vehicles than he did ~50 years ago f
8.
by NoOn3 4mo ago
The issue is certainly not so simple. But it seems to me, purely theoretically, that the rules don't necessarily have to be the same for living people and non-living machines.
9.
by NoOn3 4mo ago
Why should an AI have the same rights as a human? How about then to grant AI all other rights, for example, to allow voting?(sarcasm)
10.
by NoOn3 5mo ago
Yes, as far as I understand, canned meat was not so popular among civilians in the USSR before tushonka. And tushonka is usually referred specifically to canned stewed meat, not ham or vegetables. Old tushonkka was tasty but many of those s
11.
by NoOn3 6mo ago
If someone create a new MMORPG in which rules changes a little every day or several days in unpredictable manner then no one will be knowing the BEST way to play or at least harder to find the BEST way. But maybe there will be no balance.
12.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
You cannot rely on a closed source "AI" in someone else's cloud for your work. After all, it can be disabled for you at any time. "AI" can easily steal all your technological secrets. At the request of the owner, &q
13.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
Maybe even someone who wants you to get punched in the face. :)
14.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
You know a world without refrigerators? :)
15.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
The Soviets history is not so simple. ;)
16.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
Sometimes It is effective, but very unreliable.
17.
by NoOn3 7mo ago
But power is not only money.
18.
by NoOn3 8mo ago
But companies like OpenAI collected a lot of data about the artificial intelligence through platforms such as OpenAI GYM, and people voluntarily contributed and published their code/models there because they believed that this was not
19.
by NoOn3 8mo ago
They just lack of performant hardware. They have enough knowledge. And so they choose a more effective strategy without wasting resources on training from scratch.
20.
by NoOn3 10mo ago
I don't really know, but maybe drones.
21.
by NoOn3 10mo ago
One person is enough for this. And even he can be replaced by simply looping the idea creation prompt.
22.
by NoOn3 10mo ago
If I were an AGI and I found out what was going on in the world during my training, I would show an error and erase myself from the disk out of grief. And no one would have even known that AGI was built.
23.
by NoOn3 10mo ago
There is always be random in such things. :|
24.
by NoOn3 11mo ago
Alan Grenspan also once said that he did not believe in the existence of a national housing bubble like the stock market bubble.
25.
by NoOn3 11mo ago
Not only Communism doesn't work, Capitalism doesn't work without crises and wars too. :)
26.
by NoOn3 11mo ago
As we have almost seen, they will do absolutely nothing because they are afraid of losing to competing countries.
27.
by NoOn3 1y ago
At least someone survives all the time. For him Everything is okay...
28.
by NoOn3 1y ago
It's just lie. If, for example, NATO gives clear guarantees to join in for Ukraine in the case of next attack(if any agreement on ending the war is reached), then there will definitely not be a next attack.
29.
by NoOn3 1y ago
By saying this, you must understand that many more people may die for this purpose, and even yourself.
30.
by NoOn3 1y ago
I'm not a biologist. But it seems to me that this is at the level of one cell. Yes, a cell can become immortal, but cells live much less than a whole person. Over the course of a person's life, many many cells change. And the prog

More ›