Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NilMostChill
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
NilMostChill
5mo ago
1. I mean, yes ? the average farm worker is probably capable of writing a sentence similar to the one you just did and sicking it a prompt. Unless you mean without LLM assistance, then no. 2. I've no idea, i haven't touched c++ in
2.
▲
by
NilMostChill
5mo ago
A Luddite farm worker can assist in all those things, the question is, can it assist in a useful manner?
3.
▲
by
NilMostChill
8mo ago
what is the specific domain of jquery ?>
4.
▲
by
NilMostChill
8mo ago
TL;DR; If it's working for you, great, but presenting it like it's a general direct replacement for development teams is disingenuous. --- > Looks like we just have different expectations: i don't want to micromanage my co
5.
▲
by
NilMostChill
8mo ago
> I think i have enough control. This is probably just a disagreement about the term "control", so we can agree to disagree on that one i suppose. The rest of the reply doesn't really relate to any of the points i mentione
6.
▲
by
NilMostChill
8mo ago
> You have a lot of control over what the LLM creates. No, you don't, you have "influence" or "suggestion". You can absolutely narrow down the probability ranges of what is produced , but there is no guarantee th
7.
▲
by
NilMostChill
10mo ago
Isn't the whole point of amphetamine based treatement for ADHD to correct(or beneficially alter, depending on your point of view) an non-standard brain chemistry? AFAIK some neurodivergent brains deal with amphetamines differently and
8.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
Depends on how metaphorical and/or political you want to get. Arguably books could be considered warning waystones, but that's a stretch in this context. Physical monuments though, we have loads, lots of war memorials are/wer
9.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
Indeed, there are lots of methods, but i was specifically thinking of the possibility of a method an isolated AI might feasibly figure out with only the tools it has easily available to it. But as someone said earlier, the real interesting
10.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
The comic(manga actually) i was referring to was "Origin" by the manga author Boichi. I'll have a read of the paper, seems like it's similar in concept
11.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
There is an argument to be made that it's good training, like coding kata's just with the end to end. If you're looking to make a living off of it, the training argument only works if you then go on to used the trained skills
12.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
source? for the trends i mean, not the extrapolation.
13.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
There's a comic out right now positing that a sufficiently intelligent AI with appropriate access could use imperceptible (to us) vibrations from mechanical computing parts like spinning rust HDD's etc. It's a throwaway mecha
14.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
That's generally how it is with opinionated frameworks (and i use that term as a literal, as opposed to agnostic), you do the thing in the way expected or it's a fight. Svelte is one of the less opinionated ones i've used but
15.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
> LLMs in their current state have integrated into the workflows for many, many IT roles. They'll never be niche, unless governing bodies come together to kill them. That is an exaggeration, it is integrated into some workflows, u
16.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
> The author definitely saw it as a targeted attack that, when it failed, caused the attacker to switch tactics to intentionally cause harm. Saying "someone or something" is generic and also accurate it doesn't explicitly
17.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
>I'm no Elon fan, but I can not think of a single human who has done more to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. We could use some of that clean energy he's facilitated to extract a small amount of gold from seawater. Enough to
18.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
None of what i said had anything to do with the nature of the attack, personal or otherwise. The author seems to be taking it a bit personally but they don't seem to be implying an attack targeted to them exclusively as much as an atta
19.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
Entitled, probably not, able to communicate frustrations and suggest alternative options, absolutely.
20.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
It being common doesn't mean it's OK, it also doesn't mean people aren't allowed to be upset by it. Casual racism and bigotry are common, "You probably need to calm down a bit" is dismissive and condescending.
21.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
I'm aware of my own perspective, i don't generally crusade against whatever flavour of machine learning is being pushed currently. I was just pointing out that arguing against crusading by using an argument (or analogies) that lea
22.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
Shallow take. Your analogies only work if you don't take in to account there are different degrees of utility/quality/usefulness of the product. People absolutely crusade against dangerous food, or even just food that has no
23.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
I'm not who you were asking but i can provide a specific encroachment example. The anti-protest law update that was passed over the last few years specifically (using the law) curbs the ability to protest freely in public spaces. It&#x
24.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
It sounds interesting, but its still just moving the problem surface elsewhere. Bringing model definition and usage closer to the storage layer thereby reducing the need for translation and transport might cut down on the need for repeated
25.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
If you're putting advanced feature support into a db engine , you're probably also putting in semi-competent debugging support (at least i'd hope so). But again, at that point you're really just moving the surface rather
26.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
That's....certainly a take. it hurts that it's not exactly wrong. but i don't think it's 100% right either, there are some things that you just can't do reliably, in current db engines at least. As soon as you start
27.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
I will defer to your superior knowledge of his actual writing, i haven't read them, i was referring purely to your reply to the statement provided. The quote mentioned faith and philosophy by name, if the actual writings are more about
28.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
To be clear, i'm not religious nor do i have much in the way of faith. I just don't think faith and philosophy are mutually exclusive. My impression of organised religion is unfavourable so I'm almost certainly biased in my p
29.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
Perhaps you're conflating faith with religion. Faith being "confidence, trust or belief in a thing , person or concept, sometimes in the absence of proof" Not to be confused with "blind faith" which is the above but
30.
▲
by
NilMostChill
1y ago
That's a possibility for me, sure, but your original reply was basically: "a solution is, everybody should be able to do everything, that way we don't have to do any actual skill based resource management because everyone is
More ›