Nicksil

7 ms·

1.
by Nicksil 4mo ago
>I have seen this posted many times but can anyone elaborate? Read the article.
2.
by Nicksil 8mo ago
Do you still work for Google?
3.
by Nicksil 10mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46109141
4.
by Nicksil 10mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46108940
5.
by Nicksil 1y ago
hn@ycombinator.com
6.
by Nicksil 1y ago
https://testflight.apple.com/join/QwkyFq6z
7.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>They just got through saying that foul play was not suspected. It'd be nice if you could not slander the dead. >not suspected lol, It's all speculation. No one knows anything at this point. Have there been cases in the past
8.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>I think you must be misreading. You brought this up in the first place when you said "Should probably also disclose you work for Google when making such a statement about one of its products.". Before that, I did not say anyth
9.
by Nicksil 2y ago
Right. They asked why I thought they worked at Google and it's because they said they worked at Google.
10.
by Nicksil 2y ago
You asked why I thought you worked at Google and it's because you said as much.
11.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>I don't work at Google. Why do you think I work at Google [...] >[...] I worked at Google
12.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>The fact that the car was self-driven doesn't really affect any of this That's a bit ridiculous. Of course it does; how many people do you know are OK with some random dudes making an ass of themselves in the middle of the str
13.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>Firefox is the third worst browser, unfortunately there are only three browsers and one is restricted to Apple devices. So, first best? I concur!
14.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>Most artists [...] are working in a commercial capacity. How do we know this?
15.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>They are making it up You work for Google, though. Why should your word be trusted over the others'?
16.
by Nicksil 2y ago
Indeed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_altitude
17.
by Nicksil 2y ago
>How do you do wandering mode? Top-right of window
18.
by Nicksil 2y ago
Mozilla Firefox has put a lot of time into their PDF reader. https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/browsers/
19.
by Nicksil 3y ago
https://archive.is/Csqqk
20.
by Nicksil 3y ago
who's talking about being impressed? You are but that's all I see lol
21.
by Nicksil 3y ago
lmao this has got to be one of the most ignorant comments on hn. Unless you're just shit posting, then meh.
22.
by Nicksil 3y ago
Try Thunderbird https://www.thunderbird.net
23.
by Nicksil 3y ago
> It just doesn't seem plausible. Why do you think that? This sort of transformation can come about a number of ways. It’s not an everyday occurrence but it’s certainly not implausible.
24.
by Nicksil 3y ago
You've endarkened us
25.
by Nicksil 3y ago
> 237 Tb in an unlimited service from Google So, not excessive. 237 TB does not exceed unlimited. What am I missing here? >they knew they had found a loop hole in google policy. What, exactly, is this loop hole?
26.
by Nicksil 3y ago
>And he was never paying "a lot of money" for this. You're being obtuse: "a lot of money" in this context is a relative amount and you know that.
27.
by Nicksil 3y ago
>Life would be miserable if every restaurant had to parcel out individual sugar packets just because 1/100 people decided to abuse it and take them all home. OK >Why do you want everything to be financialized? Where did I say thi
28.
by Nicksil 3y ago
>didn't migrate the data to somebody offering a better deal Why would this be considered? What if he didn't want to migrate 200+ TB of data and just decided to stay where he's at, continuing to pay Google a lot of money? &
29.
by Nicksil 3y ago
>Things are free when people don't abuse it. Just be normal. Jesus. Well, no, things are free until they stop being free. Who gets to decide what "normal" means.
30.
by Nicksil 3y ago
>The actual text in the story doesn't match the title. It's pretty obvious if you read it. I did read it. Title is definitely reflective of the articles content. Did you read it?

More ›