Nemcue

6 ms·

1.
by Nemcue 9y ago
Cool stuff! I built the same thing but with configurable size grid using Hammerspoon.
2.
by Nemcue 9y ago
> If the test isn't necessary, then neither is the code. How did you come to this conclusion? What if the code is just glue code for different libraries?
3.
by Nemcue 9y ago
.. manipulate some of that data to improve their ads.
4.
by Nemcue 10y ago
Afaik it's so complex it can't keep up with Lua though.
5.
by Nemcue 10y ago
For context: thelocal is not a reliable newspaper, you shouldn't base your facts from their articles.
6.
by Nemcue 10y ago
Why would flow + es6 be better?
7.
by Nemcue 10y ago
I don't think you're familiar with what TypeScript is trying to achieve. It's not supposed to be another language entirely, but a standards-compatible type-safe version.
8.
by Nemcue 10y ago
You need to realize most mid- and junior programmers simply aren't good.
9.
by Nemcue 10y ago
The difference is that you're spending time learning about concepts that you are unfamiliar with, as opposed to learning Angulars many APIs. For instance if you've already spent time learning about Redux you'll have a very ea
10.
by Nemcue 10y ago
At the moment? No, I don't think so. To be brutally honest I think the only reason why this is on HN frontpage is because of its name. It's quite telling that they kept the name despite it being a totally different beast with (imh
11.
by Nemcue 10y ago
Cons: 1. Typescript. If your team isn't familiar with it it's not trivial to get everyone on board. The up-front cost can absolutely be worth it in the long run, but there's some friction in the day-to-day work with managing
12.
by Nemcue 10y ago
I wish people would just stop pointing this out. While technically true when people refer to React they're referring to the canonical stack that people use (i.e. + Redux).
13.
by Nemcue 10y ago
Except very few actually take the time to understand the data model..
14.
by Nemcue 10y ago
I too switched to VSC from Atom recently, mostly due to the TypeScript-support being vastly superior in terms of both stability and speed. Really, really wish they would focus on providing a proper crashlog. Right now I'm getting inter
15.
by Nemcue 10y ago
Sounds like something the US would do.
16.
by Nemcue 11y ago
I too do my absolute best work in that kind of mode. However, I'm thoroughly lacking on the "take a well deserved rest" part after crunching on my own. Since no one actually sees me working so hard, I have no idea how I would
17.
by Nemcue 11y ago
Oh great, now everyone can enjoy the immense horribleness of TFS.
18.
by Nemcue 11y ago
You're probably being downvoted because you come off as incredibly smug.
19.
by Nemcue 11y ago
No, it needs HTML for silly technologist not to whine when their browser extensions break the web.
20.
by Nemcue 11y ago
That's an incredibly dehumanising way of viewing the world. A view I guess is shared by the ones who conducts your tortures and carries out your murders. Shame on you.
21.
by Nemcue 11y ago
To the citizens of nations that are being bullied by those organisations it's NOT a feature.
22.
by Nemcue 11y ago
> which was never a real problem in the first place... You obviously haven't worked on any legacy app built in jQuery.
23.
by Nemcue 11y ago
Sometimes a solution — or a variety of different solutions — still have a significant pain point attached to them. Just because of that, you can't derive with absolute certainty that there's "a better solution". It might
24.
by Nemcue 11y ago
Not easier to reason about? I would argue the opposite — it is immediately easier to reason about, since I see what functions are called, and I can go look up the documentations for those functions without having to go through a precompil
25.
by Nemcue 11y ago
One big feature in my mind — and I've used both Handlebars, Mustache, and HTMLbars a lot — is the fact that it compiles straight down to a JS data structure. Especially with Handlebars it's always kind of tricky to debug, becaus
26.
by Nemcue 11y ago
That is because you're used to JSX. They are equivalent to me, and — disregarding the fact that you used arrow functions in one and not the other — equally easy to read. What would make it "hard" to read? The fact that the th
27.
by Nemcue 11y ago
"I'm still yet to be convinced that JSX is a good idea, why break existing tooling and significantly complicate parsers for what appears to only be a minor convenience at the surface level?" Because the template is already
28.
by Nemcue 11y ago
What— you don't approve of the sleek aluminium unergonomic mushroom-key:d Apple Keyboards? Heretic!
29.
by Nemcue 11y ago
You have no idea what you're talking about.
30.
by Nemcue 11y ago
Because they are libraries, not frameworks.

More ›