Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NanoCoaster
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
Hi, thanks for answering :) > Collection expressions made the language more coherent. Instead of 7 different ways of doing things (some of which were genuinely not efficient), we gave one uniform way of doing it. I see your point on thi
2.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
AFAIK it was a much more down-to-earth thing. The implementation of computation expressions in F# compiled down to lots of function objects that were not very GC-friendly. Or something like that. To be honest, I never looked that deeply at
3.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
No, this is just a constructor call, it's purely syntax sugar for the new() way of doing it. > I'm also not sure that something not being intuitive or natural is necessarily a bad thing in of itself. You state it as if it'
4.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
I guess I overdramatized the situation a bit :) It's a passionate topic for me; as somebody who has been using C# at work for 10 years now, I'm just not happy with the direction the language has been taking. You're right, it&
5.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
Haha, yeah, maybe :) I would've loved an F# that found a way to improve on the performance issues, especially when using computation expressions. That and, either, a deeper integration of .NETs native OOP subtyping, or some form of OCa
6.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
I'm 100% on board with the [] syntax. I'm not on board with adding the syntax for passing arguments to the constructor within that syntax. I agree that = [] is perfectly fine syntax. But I would definitely argue that: [with(capaci
7.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
5mo ago
Absolutely agree. Modern C# language design feels very much lacking in vision or direction. It's mostly a bunch of shiny-looking language features being bolted on, all in ways that make the language massively more complex. Just look at
8.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
6mo ago
Oof, that's disappointing to hear. Thanks though, that's actually quite interesting. I'm also thinking of keeping an android phone purely for auth purposes, separate from my main one. The world's most overengineered (and
9.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
6mo ago
Will eIDAS be the only way to identify yourself in cases where it's needed, or will we be able to user other mechanisms like the german ID card stuff or an entirely separate alternative? Or to put it another way, is a smartphone requir
10.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
6mo ago
I'm not sure either. I've looked at this other document: https://bmi.usercontent.opencode.de/eudi-wallet/eidas-2.0-ar... It seems to imply that the already existing way of authenticating via eID, which is the
11.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
6mo ago
Because there are other factors at play. No-till is mostly about sustainability of farming. Humans often don't optimize for the most sustainable option but for the option that's most profitable (or perceived to be most profitable)
12.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
6mo ago
Oh, great to see this on HN! I found Filmulator a few years ago and used it for most of my raw photography (which, admittedly, isn't a lot) and found it amazing. Exactly what I wanted. Streamlined, easy to get into, fun. And I really l
13.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
7mo ago
> Reality is that most women buy based on looks and not practicality. I really had not heard before your comment any women complaining about small pockets. I've had the exact opposite experience. I've heard this complaint many,
14.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
11mo ago
> People have lost faith in us. That's a very powerful way to sum up what I've been feeling for a while. People did lose faith, and to be honest, I can't really blame them. From a layman's perspective, it's not o
15.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
The feds, absolutely. Still, there's a lot of other parties that should not have an easy way of accessing the data (if there is any - the joys of closed source implementations).
16.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
There's a difference between web technologies and "the web" as an amorphous philosophical construct. Web technologies, as you stated, are obviously doing just fine. I'd argue the latter isn't. To be more specific, t
17.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
Sounds cool, I'll keep an eye on it :D
18.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
> Minecraft modding is also unofficial (you still don't have code or an API, you have to decompile! you do have datapacks but those can't do shit compared to proper modding) Not quite, I'm working on a Minecraft mod via Fa
19.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
> long gone are the days of games with actual modding support I'll disagree here. Kerbal Space Program, Rimworld, Minecraft all have gigantic modding communities, just to name a few. There's many, many games like that. In the c
20.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
1y ago
There's cinny, which is a pretty polished Matrix client that is very, uh, inspired by Discord in its look, that might soon add voice rooms: https://github.com/cinnyapp/cinny/pull/2335 I played around wit
21.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
2y ago
Yup, definite recommendation for Turing Complete. It looks nice, is really well done and very addictive. Also, it's on GOG ( https://www.gog.com/game/turing_complete ) which is always nice.
22.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
2y ago
Thanks, I'll take what I can get :D
23.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
2y ago
Not a question, just wanted to say I'm a big fan of your blog and have been binge-reading it in recent times. I really enjoy the way you explain concepts like transistor types, digital logic and chip design in a way that even somebody
24.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
3y ago
Fancy. Think I'm gonna go with a traditional bridge for my usecase, but this looks pretty cool. Maybe I have some other uses for it for other applications. Thank you :)
25.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
3y ago
I always assumed that the VPN connection is shared by many HTB users, so it seemed like a good idea to be a bit paranoid about the trustworthyness of a VM that is reachable by lots of users that may want to mess around. Maybe I was wrong ab
26.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
3y ago
If you don't mind, I have a specific question regarding this setup. I've been looking into getting into pentesting, mostly for fun. I decided on messing around with HackTheBox as a starting point. Seeing as you need to connect to
27.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
3y ago
Definitely recommend Turing Complete. I've been playing it off and on over the last few weeks, just finished the first working CPU. It includes small hints and solutions for most levels, so if you get stuck, you'll always have a w
28.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
4y ago
I don't know what parts of western Europe you're talking about, but in Germany, cyclists absolutely make left turns all the time. Also, drivers are taught about this in driving school, so they will (or should at least) expect cycl
29.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
4y ago
Alternatively, just let people mod their games as they please. I see your point and you're not wrong, but people have different priorities and playing video games is a hugely subjective experience anyway. Yes, adding a sentence or two
30.
▲
by
NanoCoaster
4y ago
> My experience with the Germans not wanting to speak German with you while you stumble over everything, is simply that they want to exercise their own English, and its just not as fun for them to wait for your marble-mouthed nonsense to
More ›